Retiring three vocabularies at once was my call and the wrong one. Keyword
had to go — it was the old route to an organ system, which a topic now
carries, and that took Systems from half the bank to all of it. Subject
and disease went with it on the argument that the topic tree says the same
thing. It mostly does, and "mostly" is not a reason to remove the
vocabulary people had learned to filter by.
203 subjects and 2,275 diseases are back, with their 14,029 links, and the
Disciplines and Diseases pickers with them. Keywords stay retired.
The backup I wrote before deleting was not where I said it was:
`./backups` is mounted on db-backup, not on backend, so the file went with
the next container rebuild. The rows came from the nightly dump instead,
which is what that dump is for. scripts/restore_subject_disease_tags reads
a pg_dump extract, is idempotent, and resets the sequence afterwards so
the next tag created by hand does not collide with a restored one.
/tags serves subjects and diseases from their own links again, and systems
through the topics that carry them.
The Performance tab is ordered as the reference has it: the trend beside
the split it is a trend in, and Completion's four figures underneath.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Deleting a user failed with a not-null violation from quiz_attempts.
Every foreign key to users is already CASCADE or SET NULL in Postgres,
but the ORM relationships had no passive_deletes, so SQLAlchemy insisted
on emptying each one itself by writing NULL into columns that refuse it.
passive_deletes leaves it to the database, which knows. The two tables
that genuinely cannot forget a user — question_categories and
quiz_categories are NOT NULL and NO ACTION — hand their rows to the
administrator doing the deleting: the taxonomy is the site's, not the
author's.
/tags counted through question_tag_links, which is now empty, so every
organ system read zero and an active exam hid them entirely. It counts
through the topics that carry them instead: 2,919 of 2,924 questions, all
sixteen systems with real numbers. The session builder's Disciplines and
Symptoms pickers were over the retired vocabularies and are gone —
Topics is the same axis said once and said better, 673 against 203.
The end-block dialog offered one button. A confirmation with one button
is not a confirmation: it now leads with the way back into the block,
says how many are unanswered as a sentence rather than a grid to count
by eye, and the unanswered are numbers you can press to go there.
Registration asks for the password twice, on both forms — a password you
cannot see is one you can mistype into an account you then cannot open.
The public pages had no footer, so signing in meant losing the way to
About, Contact and the clinical disclaimer. They sit in a plain layout
that keeps it.
Draft batches can be filed from the workbench: the topic they file into
is a picker at the top, and nothing crosses over until it is set.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
claims to hold them
The scaffolding is down. 203 subject, 2,275 disease and 4,281 keyword
tags, and 25,356 links, deleted — backed up first to a 1.9MB JSON of
replayable rows, because "we can always put it back" should be true
rather than said. The 16 system rows stay: categories point at them.
With them go the things that only existed to feed them — the
classify_questions task, its snapshot helpers, POST /tags/classify and
its status poll — and the three Taxonomy tabs that would now always read
zero. A tab showing 0 forever teaches people the page is broken.
The organ-system filter in the session builder moved onto categories with
the rest, including everything beneath a matched topic, so it groups the
way the analysis does.
Registration: `settings:registration_enabled` was set to false, and there
was no switch anywhere on the site to set it back. The API had always
accepted it; the Site policy page had never shown it. So the site could
be closed to new members with the admin looking at three switches, all
correct, and no way to see the one that was actually refusing them. It is
now the first switch on that page, and says plainly that the ones below
it have nothing to act on while it is off. The SSO-only flag was hidden
the same way and is shown when SSO is configured.
Deleting a topic no longer silently unfiles its questions. It asks where
they go, and says how many are waiting, unless the topic is empty — the
same rule promotion now follows. Its extra category links move too,
minus any that would duplicate a pair the destination already has.
Back links: Trash, Extraction jobs, Taxonomy and the Handbook had none at
all, and Access pointed at the wrong section. They are one component now,
each returning one step to the section it was opened from. Editorial has
its own entry in the section bar, so its Tools card is gone rather than
being a second door to the same room.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
that stops answering the wrong question
Invite-only was set and the sign-up form had nowhere to type a code.
There are two registration forms — /register and the modal on the landing
page — and only the first had been taught about invite codes. The modal
is the one most people meet, so turning the gate on failed everybody with
"an invite code is required" and no field to satisfy it. It now asks the
same signup-policy question and shows the same field.
Dictation records to our own transcriber first and falls back to the
browser's recogniser only where recording is unavailable. It was the
other way round for speed, but the browser's speech stack announces
itself to the user in ways we do not control — Firefox interrupts the
page with a warning about a missing Speech Dispatcher library, which is
alarming and is not about us.
A draft question could be promoted into the bank with no category. That
question would reach nothing: no discipline, no organ system, no
relevance, no row on any tab of the analysis — in the bank and invisible
to every page that counts. Promotion now refuses, before an id is spent.
And "Your overall analysis" is out of the session rail. It put lifetime
figures one click away while you were standing in front of a single
session, which is the thing that was supposed to have moved to the
Performance tab.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
A question reached a system through a symptom keyword it happened to
mention — question → keyword → parent system — and only 726 of 4,281
keywords had ever been given a parent. The Systems tab saw 1,492 of 2,924
questions while Disciplines saw all of them.
The system now sits on the category: question_categories.system_id. Every
question has a category, so every question reaches a system. 2,919 of
2,924, and all sixteen buckets have real content.
It stays a third way of asking rather than the discipline tree relabelled
because a topic's system is assigned separately from where it sits in the
tree. scripts/assign_category_systems takes the discipline as a default
and lets the topic's own name overrule it, which is exactly the case that
makes the axis worth having: conjunctivitis is filed under Infectious
Disease and is an eye, osteomyelitis is filed there and is a bone. 110 of
660 topics were decided that way.
Two regex traps caught in the dry run and fixed before applying:
"adRENAL" matched the kidney rule, and "Abnormal Uterine Bleeding" matched
the bleeding rule. Both now have a specific rule above the general one.
I first tried to fix this by parenting the orphan keywords to systems,
deriving each keyword's system from the questions carrying it. The dry run
showed why that was the wrong shape: it reached only 534 of 3,555 orphans,
and inherited every coarse edge of the discipline map — conjunctivitis came
out as Multisystem because conjunctivitis questions are filed under
Infectious Disease. That script is left in place, unapplied, as the record
of a measurement worth keeping.
No ForeignKey on system_id in the model: question_tags is a raw-SQL table
with no ORM class, and declaring one leaves every metadata build unable to
resolve it. The constraint is real in Postgres.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Four things, all from one screenshot pair.
The Review button in a study session was inherited from the exam player.
Reviewing a block before handing it in is an exam idea; a study session
has nothing to hand in — it keeps going until every question is answered
and at that point it *is* the review. The review link, the top-bar
button and the rail button are exam-only now, and a study session whose
questions are all answered says "Finish session" and submits rather than
opening a dialog to ask a second time.
The drawer's "Qbank" pointed at /questions, which has never been a route
— /questions/:id is the editor. It went nowhere. It points at
/question-bank, and Collections and AI Mode join the list.
While a session is open on a narrow screen, the navbar burger now opens
that session's questions instead of the site menu, which is a tab inside
the same drawer. Two menu buttons an inch apart, one of which leaves the
session you are sitting, is the wrong offer. The player claims the button
only while it has no rail, and hands it back when it leaves.
And the drawer says what AMBOSS's does: a Review badge once everything is
answered, the mode in the title, a progress bar under the count, and the
session and question clocks pinned beneath the list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
AI Mode could cite an article and link to it; it could not do the other
half of the job. POST /ai/conversations/{id}/practice turns an answer
into a study session, built from what that answer actually cited: a
question it named first, then questions filed under the category of an
article it named, then retrieval on the learner's own words. Everything
goes through the bank's visibility rules on the way out — a chat is not a
route to questions a learner could not otherwise reach. Study mode, never
exam: this is reading followed by practice, not a paper.
Two false alarms on the Settings page, both visible in a screenshot:
The STT test called /model/info on the LiteLLM proxy. Our virtual key is
scoped to llm_api_routes and cannot, so a working transcription model
reported a red 403. It now falls back to /v1/models, which the key may
call, and says plainly that the proxy would not confirm what the model is
for — presence, not suitability.
And the TTS test raised a 400 carrying an instruction ("use the Preview
button"), which the page rendered in red with a ✗. That is not a failure.
It answers, and Preview stays the way to hear a voice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Favorites and the question libraries in one place. Card and Table views
with the choice remembered, sort by last used / created / name / size
with a direction control, a count line, and a search over name and date.
Favorites leads as a fixed row: it is the one shelf nobody made and
everybody has, so it cannot be renamed or deleted.
Sorted by when each was last used, not when it was made — the order
things were created in is nobody's mental model of their own shelf. A
library nobody has opened falls back to its age, because it is newer to
the learner than it is to the database. That needed
`user_collections.last_used_at`: null on every existing row, since
backfilling from created_at would invent a use that never happened.
A shelf opens in place rather than linking away. The obvious link would
have been /questions?collection=N, and there is no page there that reads
it — the old bank browser was dismantled — so the card would have led
nowhere. Questions can be taken back out from the open shelf, and any
shelf can be sat as a session through the existing explicit_ids builder.
The ⋯ menu moved out of QuizPage into components/MoreMenu; the player
keeps its own look and its own children through className props. It no
longer closes on any click inside, which the player's feedback form and
share dialog were relying on by accident.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The session analysis ranked its weakest topics by primary category only,
while the Analysis page asked the same question three ways and rolled
answers up the category tree. Two sets of rules for "where does this
question belong" is two pages that can disagree about a learner and
neither able to explain why.
So the rules moved to services/knowledge_groups.py: ancestor roll-up,
article reached through its category, organ system reached through the
symptom keyword. study_tools now asks that service instead of building
the lookups inline, and GET /attempts/{id}/recommendations gives one
session the same Articles / Disciplines / Systems switch. Grouping is its
own call, so changing it does not re-read the question table and the peer
statistics beside it. A running exam ranks nothing — marking it there
would answer the question the exam is asking.
The ungrouped `recommendations` key is gone from the analysis payload
along with the code that built it.
And the document page had no way back. It is reached from the Tools
workbench, which by design has no menu of its own, so leaving it meant
the browser button. It opens onto Tools now, as Tools opens onto
Settings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Your score is the share of questions right at your most recent answer to
each. It is deliberately not called an equated score: AMBOSS's EPC rests
on psychometrics we do not have, and a number dressed up as one would be
a claim we cannot support. The card says so.
Against everyone else compares you with other learners on the questions
you have in common — not with their scores on whatever they happened to
sit. A percentile over different question sets reads someone who worked
through the hardest fifty in the bank as weaker than someone who did
fifty easy ones, which is the opposite of true.
Neither appears before it means anything, and each says which half is
missing: more questions of your own, more questions shared with others,
or more learners. The cohort reported is the most any one shared question
saw — distinct learners cannot be summed across questions without
counting the same person once per question.
The "readiness is still locked" note sat above the tab switch and so
appeared on Performance, where it described a table that is on the other
tab. Moved down to the table it is about.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Two gaps closed. `attending_tip` has been on the question model and in
the API since before this session, rendered by the player — and there was
no field anywhere in the UI to put anything in it. The question editor
now has one, at the foot of the Explanation card.
And the inline kind is written by selecting the words: select "stridor"
in the stem, press ⚕ Tip on that field's toolbar, and the caret waits
where the tip goes. With nothing selected it drops in a marker with
"phrase" highlighted to type over.
A question with no tip offers no button — that was already true in the
player, and is now pinned by a test rather than left to hold by
accident. An emptied tip saves as null for the same reason.
The handbook says how to do both, and what a tip costs the learner:
opened before answering it is recorded with the answer and shown as
"correct after a tip"; opened while reading the explanation it is
revision and costs nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
`GET /study-tools/performance-over-time` returns a point per completed
session with two figures: that session's percentage, and the running
score across everything answered up to that day. The chart draws the
running line and marks the sessions along it — a single session of twelve
questions swings too far to say anything about whether a learner is
improving.
It stays shut below 40 answers or 3 sessions and says which of the two it
is waiting for, rather than drawing a line through two points and letting
the shape suggest a trend that is not there.
LineChart was in the tree unused, with a hardcoded slate palette that
vanishes on a dark page. Rewritten against the theme tokens.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Opening a tip before answering is a nudge. The answer that follows is
still right — it is counted as right, and the percentage is not docked —
but it is not the same as right, so it keeps its own arc on the donut and
its own line in the legend: "3 correct after a tip".
attempt_answers.used_hint records it. The player reports which questions
had a tip opened before the answer went in; a tip read afterwards is
revision and does not count, which is the difference two of the tests
turn on. Both endings agree about it — an explicit submit carries the
list, and an exam that runs out takes it from the saved progress, so a
tab closing cannot launder a score.
Found while wiring this: RichText declared its component overrides inline
in the render, so every one was a fresh component type and React
remounted the whole rendered tree on each render. An open tip closed
itself every time the exam clock ticked. The map is memoised now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
`{{stridor|Inspiratory stridor is extrathoracic until proven otherwise}}`
in any stem, option, explanation or article renders the phrase with a
dotted underline; clicking it opens the sentence where the word is.
Nothing is revealed until asked for, and Esc or a second click closes it.
The question already had an Attending tip — one panel, for the whole
question, reached from the toolbar. This is the other half: the point
that belongs to one word, said next to that word.
Done as a remark plugin rather than a search-and-replace on the source,
because highlights and the read-aloud cursor are stored as offsets into
the raw text; rewriting the string before it is parsed would move every
offset after the first tip. The split pieces carry line and column as
well as offset — a point with only one of the three is discarded
downstream, which cost the first version every highlight past the tip.
There is a test for exactly that.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The same slate, two steps up (#0f172a → #1e293b), and the warm theme's
bar with it. Near-black across the top read as a band sitting on the page
rather than part of it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
A question got wrong in March and right in September is 50% by one count
and 100% by another, and both are true. The Performance tab now says
which it is answering: All attempts is every answer ever given — how much
work has been done — and Latest attempt keeps only the most recent answer
to each question — what is known now.
GET /study-tools/answer-split returns both splits plus the session and
unique-question counts, under the same exclusions as everything else that
measures: no repetitions, no course quizzes, no expired attempts. A blank
is its own slice, never folded into incorrect.
The ring itself moves out of AnalysisSessionPage into components/Donut so
the session view and the lifetime view cannot drift apart. Its legend
gains .is-answered, which the session page had been asking for without
anything defining it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
"How am I doing" and "how was I doing last month" are different questions,
and a single lifetime figure cannot answer both. Analysis now carries a
Completion panel on the Performance tab: questions answered against the
bank, how many were right, time per question, total time — over 7 days,
30 days, 3 months, or everything.
GET /study-tools/completion?days=N does the counting. It leaves out what
would not be a measurement: repetitions (you already know that answer),
course quizzes (they belong to their course), and expired attempts. A
question left blank is not a wrong answer, so the percentage is out of
what was answered, not out of what was set. Nothing answered reports
nothing rather than 0%.
The Tools workbench has no menu of its own by design, which left no way
back; it now opens onto Settings where it was reached from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Hitting an educators-only page redirected to the dashboard in silence,
which leaves you looking at a page you did not ask for with no idea
whether the link was broken, you mistyped, or it simply is not yours. It
says which, and offers the dashboard and settings — the two places you
are actually likely to want from there. Not being signed in stays a
redirect, because there is nothing to explain.
The section row gave its name whatever width was left after a button
group that would not wrap, so "NBME 7 STEP 3" broke to one word a line
while Extract, Create Cards and Delete ran off the right of the card. On
a narrow screen the name takes the row and the buttons take the next
one. The page had a stylesheet that nothing imported, which is why it
had no layout rules of its own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The phone had a dot grid dropped under the top bar — a different thing
in a different place doing the rail's job worse. It is a drawer holding
the same rail the desktop has, with the site's own menu on the other
tab, because the alternative is a second hamburger elsewhere for the
same purpose. The dot grid and its styles are gone.
And the extraction pipeline was run end to end against a three-question
PDF rather than reasoned about. It works: three questions, stems,
options, correct answers and explanations, landing in a draft batch and
not in the bank. But the run found a real bug on the way.
A document's text is read from the search index, not from the file. When
that index is missing — never processed, or lost to a restart — every
page is skipped and the job fails with "the AI could not find questions
with correct answers in this page range". That is the wrong diagnosis,
and it sends people to change the model, the prompt and the page range,
none of which is the problem. The two failures are now counted apart and
named apart: no stored text says so and says to re-process; a model that
found nothing says that instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Sitting the same questions again is practice, not a new measurement. You
have already seen the answers, so getting them right the second time
says nothing about whether you knew them — and it cannot be allowed to
raise a figure that means "how much of this do you know". A repeated
session is titled "(repetition)", analysed in full on its own page, and
left out of every aggregate: the overall accuracy, the per-quiz history,
the averages, and the readiness that drives recommendations.
Deleting a single session is gone — control, endpoint, tests and all. A
session is a record of work done, and removing one edits the history
every figure on the analysis is computed from, which turns a measurement
into a number somebody chose. Starting again is still offered whole,
under Settings, Your data, which takes everything rather than the parts
that flatter.
Two layout bugs behind that. The category tree kept its appearance in
QuestionBankPage.css, so it looked right on the bank and took whatever
the host page did to a label everywhere else — in the question editor
that centred the name, leaving it adrift with the count at the far
right; it owns its own stylesheet now. And the editor's grid collapsed
to `1fr` below 900px, whose automatic minimum lets one unshrinkable
child push the column past the window: the page had padding down its
left and none down its right because the right was off the screen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The section bar is a light surface inside a dark navbar, and `.navbar`
sets a near-white text colour for that dark background. Everything in
the light bar inherited it: the study objective, its dropdown, the
counts. The section links had their own colour override and looked fine,
which is why it went unnoticed for so long.
`.navbar a`, `.navbar button` and their hovers are scoped to
`.navbar-primary` — the dark bar they were written for — rather than to
everything beneath it, which was also giving the switcher a translucent
white border on a white surface. And the section bar sets its own text
colour rather than inheriting one meant for a dark ground.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The knowledge profile ranked topics by how much of *our* bank sat under
each one, which is a fact about us rather than about the exam. It made
cardiology and rheumatology equally worth an evening whenever we happened
to hold the same number of each. The ABP publishes that one is 5% of the
paper and the other 2%, and exam_blueprints.weight has held that since
the blueprint landed.
A domain's weight is divided among the topics beneath it in proportion
to the material each holds, so the topics under a domain add up to its
published share. 672 of our categories now carry one. A topic the
outline does not cover keeps the bank-share figure rather than reporting
nothing — and the row says which it is, because the two numbers mean
different things and should not be read as the same one.
Session analysis is a link to the last session rather than a third tab
with nothing behind it — a session's analysis is a session, and the rail
beside this page is the list of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
`html, body { overflow-x: hidden }` makes both a scroll container, and a
`position: sticky` descendant then sticks to that rather than to the
viewport — which is to say it does not stick at all. Every sticky thing
in the app was affected: the session rail, the settings nav, the article
column, the study-plan rail. `overflow-x: clip` does the same job without
becoming a scroll container. Hidden stays as the fallback, so a browser
without `clip` still cannot be scrolled sideways and only loses
stickiness, which is the lesser fault.
Putting the rail away destroyed the layout. The collapsed grid was
`0 minmax(0, 1fr)` and the rail is `display: none`, so the content
became the *first* grid item and landed in the zero-width column —
wrapping one word per line beside an empty page. One column when there
is one thing in it.
100vh is the largest viewport on iOS — the one with the URL bar hidden —
so anything sized to it is taller than the screen really is and its
bottom sits behind the bar. Eleven files now use 100dvh, which tracks
the viewport as it changes.
The AI Mode composer was the one bottom-sticky bar with no safe-area
inset; its send button sat under the home indicator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Striking an option through is how anybody works a five-option question:
eliminate, then choose among what is left. The control sits outside the
option so that ruling one out is never mistaken for picking it, and it
goes once the question is marked — there is nothing left to narrow down.
Not saved: it is working-out, not an answer, and should not follow you
into another sitting of the same question.
Moving on from a question you have not answered is a decision, so the
button says which one it is rather than calling both Next.
The highlighter was a 72%-opacity band across the bottom 62% of every
line — over the text rather than behind it. Descenders vanished into it,
small type became hard to read, and a link inside a highlight lost the
underline that said it was a link. It starts below the x-height now, is
light enough to read through, keeps link underlines, and dims on a dark
ground where the same yellow glared.
Create Test goes straight into the session. You chose the topics, the
count and the mode and pressed Create Test; an overview asking whether
you meant it is a second confirmation of a decision already made twice.
And the action bar has a layout of its own below 700px. With no rules it
wrapped into whatever the flex produced — a label on its own line, two
pills, then a Refresh and an outsized Create Test. Two rows: the mode
toggle is the question, Create Test is the answer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Study mode held a choice as a draft and waited for "Submit response" — a
second press to confirm something already decided, on every question.
Clicking an option marks it now, green or red, with the explanation.
Free text is the exception and keeps Enter, because typing is not
choosing.
Figures carried a generated caption: "Figure from question #3360 (from
images/doc_23/page_704_img_0.jpeg)". That describes the database, not
the picture, and showed a learner an internal file path. 341 of them are
cleared, the indexer no longer writes them, and an unlabelled figure now
says nothing rather than "Figure 1". A screen reader still gets the
label and caption when there are any, and the position when there are
not.
Suspend, Restart and Edit are gone from above the question. Three
buttons over a question nobody was looking away from to press them; Exit
is in the bar at the bottom with the session's own controls, and
restarting and editing belong to the session list and the editor.
And iOS Safari's zoom-on-focus is fixed once rather than per field.
Safari zooms the whole page in when a control smaller than 16px takes
focus and never zooms back out, leaving the layout scaled and broken. It
was being remembered at each individual field, which meant it was
forgotten at most of them — a dozen were still under 16px. One rule for
every control on a coarse pointer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Uploading, extracting and reviewing were three places and the middle one
wrote straight into the bank. They are one job, so they are one page:
the documents, the batches a run produced, and the drafts themselves,
with the counts of what is still to be read said before anything else.
The review is an editor, because that is what the staging table is for.
A draft that is not ready says why on its own row rather than on a
failed attempt to accept it, and cannot be selected until it is fixed.
Fixing happens in place, with nothing in the bank. Only the chosen,
ready ones cross over, and that is the single moment a question id is
taken — an accepted draft then says which question it became.
Nextcloud is the administrator's. It was in every learner's settings as
though each of them had a cloud to connect; it is an import path for
whoever loads the corpus.
The image work is restated in the TODO now that the ped-ai design has
actually been read rather than remembered: allow-listed widths only,
EXIF rotate, resize without enlarging, WebP q82, derivatives in the same
bucket under a thumbs/ prefix, generated best-effort. Pillow rather than
sharp — sharp is Node and this backend is Python — and no Caddy caching,
because these are behind auth and ped-ai serves its own private,
no-store for that reason.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Unanswered questions were counted as wrong in every percentage the site
reports. That made leaving an exam early look like failing it, and made
the figure say more about how far you got than about how well you did —
and how far you got is already the number sitting beside it.
An unanswered question is not a wrong answer. It is not an answer.
score_percent() and answered_counts() give the rule one definition, used
by all seven places that reported a percentage: submission, attempt
history, per-quiz history, the overall average, per-quiz stats, one
attempt's detail, and the session analysis. The list endpoints count in
one query rather than one per row.
The review dialog said unanswered questions count as incorrect, which
was true and is not any more. It now says they will not be marked wrong,
and will not be marked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The card offered Review answers and Resume session at once on a session
still in progress, which is the muddle: there is nothing to review yet
and nothing to resume once it is done. It is one or the other now, and
what decides it is whether anything is left to answer — not whether it
was an exam or a study session, which have the same two states as each
other. A study session keeps going until every question is answered and
becomes the review at that point, without waiting to be handed in.
Repeat is offered either way. The questions worth sitting again are
worth sitting again now.
"Skipped" meant gone past, and was shown for questions in a session
still running that had not been reached. Those read "not yet answered".
And a timed block is now ninety seconds a question, set from the count
rather than asked for. Choosing a limit is a decision nobody has the
information to make — the pace belongs to the exam being rehearsed, not
to a preference — and a block sat at the wrong pace teaches the wrong
pace. Forty questions is an hour. An explicit limit is still honoured.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The clock reaching zero submitted the attempt and replaced the exam with
an analysis, with no word about why. "It submitted itself" is the one
thing a learner must not have to infer. The answers go in immediately —
that part must not wait for anybody — and the screen holds on "Time's
up" until it is acknowledged, then goes.
The last question's control says "End block" in exam mode. It opens the
same dialog it always did, which names how many are still unanswered and
that they count as incorrect, so the warning arrives before anything is
handed in rather than after.
Four tests for the time accounting the previous commit changed, covering
what it is actually for: an exam closed with eight minutes left still
has eight minutes however long ago it was started; opening and closing
spends only the time it is open for and does eventually reach zero; an
exam closed at zero is settled on the next look, for when the tab goes
before the submit lands; and one with time on it is left alone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
It ran on a wall clock. An hour away from the tab spent an hour of the
exam on questions that were never shown, and every per-question figure
was a fiction — which is the number the whole analysis is built on.
Three things stop it now. The tab being hidden, which catches switching
away. An explicit pause. And, for the commonest case the other two miss
— the tab left open on the exam while the person is in another room —
an idle watch: three minutes with no mousemove, key, wheel, touch or
scroll and it asks "Still there?", with the clock already stopped by the
time the question appears. A stray pointer movement does not answer it;
somebody has to say they are there.
Three minutes, not one, and scrolling counts as activity: reading a long
vignette is minutes without a click, and interrupting genuine reading to
ask whether you are reading is worse than occasionally crediting a
minute nobody was there for.
The server was the other half. seconds_remaining computed from
started_at and total_time, so a paused client made no difference to what
the server thought was left. It reads the saved time_left now, which is
what the player decrements only while the exam is on screen, falling
back to the wall clock for progress saved before this existed.
And a five-minute warning, said once. An exam that ends without notice
is a scramble; one that nags is a distraction.
Reverts the exam-exit-submits rule from earlier in this branch, which
was built on the opposite premise and would have charged wall-clock time
and then graded an exam whose clock should simply have stopped. Leaving
suspends, in both modes, and the overview no longer promises a clock
that does not stop for a break.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Opening the analysis of a live attempt graded it whatever the mode. In
an exam that is a way to answer, look at whether it was right, and go
back and change it — the exam defeated rather than analysed. It reports
progress now: how many are answered, how long it is taking, and each row
as answered or not. No score, no percentage, and the donut counts how
far through it is instead of how much of it is right.
Study mode still grades live, because study mode marks each answer as it
is given; there is nothing here it has not already said.
Recommendations are withheld too, which is stricter than AMBOSS — they
show a dash for correct and then list the topics to go back to, which
says which questions were wrong by another route. A recommendation is a
verdict.
The withholding stops the moment the exam is over, submitted or expired:
settle_if_expired grades through the same function a manual submit does
and sets completed_at, and everything opens from there.
Tested on both sides, because this is an integrity rule and would come
back quietly the next time the live-analysis path was touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Start for an unsat session and Resume for a started one is a distinction
the learner does not have to make. The session exists the moment it is
created, so picking it up is resuming it whether or not a question has
been answered yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Study mode reveals each stem in the rail once you have reached it, which
is right there — it is how you find the one you want to go back to. Exam
mode inherited it, and it should not have: a paper's question-status
rail says which items are answered and which are marked, and no more.
Reading back the stems of what you have sat, or ahead to what is coming,
is not something the exam being rehearsed would allow.
So in exam mode no row shows text, including the one you are on, and the
numbers are squared off rather than circled to match. Covered by a test,
because this is an integrity rule rather than styling and would come
back the next time the two modes shared a component.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The analytics table linked to /results/{attempt}?q=3 and the page ignored
the q entirely, so clicking the ninth row put you at the top of the
session to page through and find it again. Both the review and the
player honour it now. A session still running opens in the player at
that question, ready to be answered; a finished one opens its review
there.
The question column is pinned while the measures scroll past it. Five
columns do not fit a phone and barely fit a laptop, and the one you need
in order to know which row you are reading is the first — so it stays,
with the stem cut to a line and the whole of it on the link's title.
Repeat session is a dialog rather than a restart. Sitting all of it
again is rarely what anyone wants: the questions worth doing again are
the ones you got wrong and the ones you never reached, and mixing in
forty you already know turns twenty useful minutes into an hour of
mostly not. It asks which outcomes and how many, counts what is
available for each, and builds a session from exactly those — shuffled,
so repeating twice is not the same order twice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Exit asked "Suspend quiz?" and offered Stay. Nobody presses Exit by
accident, nothing is lost — the answers are saved and the clock pauses,
which the dialog was explaining rather than deciding — and a
confirmation for a reversible act is a step, not a safeguard. One press
now, and if the save fails it stays put and says so, because leaving
then would lose the answers.
Resume and Start go straight in for the same reason. The overview that
asks whether you meant it belongs to opening a link to a session you
have not seen, not to a button you came to this page and chose.
The actions moved out of the page heading and into the card that holds
the result — Repeat session, Review answers, Resume session — because a
row of buttons beside the title puts the decision as far from the
figures it follows from as the layout allows.
Delete session stays, but not as a red button next to Resume. It throws
away answers the analysis is built from, and it is the one thing here
AMBOSS has no need of — sessions are made freely, so a mis-made one is
clutter worth removing. It is a quiet control at the end of the row.
The session rail was sticky at top:0 with height:100vh, which started it
underneath the 98px header and ran it past the bottom of the window, so
the end of the list and the scroll that would reach it were never on
screen. It measures from --app-header now, and a wheel over the list
moves the list rather than carrying on into the page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Extraction wrote straight into `questions`, so a machine's first attempt
took a permanent id the moment it was produced. Ids come from a sequence
and are never reissued: every rejected draft burned one, and every draft
that needed fixing was sitting in the bank while it was being fixed.
A run now lands in a batch of drafts with their own table and their own
sequence. They are read, corrected and decided there, and `accept` is
the only place a Question is created — a copy rather than a translation,
because every field a draft holds is a field a question has, so nothing
is lost at the moment of acceptance.
Accepting is all or nothing, and everything is checked before anything
is created: a call that reports failure must not leave questions behind
from the drafts it got through first. My own test caught that — the
first question existed before the second draft was refused.
Readiness is reported for every draft rather than only on the attempt to
accept it, so a reviewer sees what needs work before opening anything.
A decided draft keeps its row and records what it became, so a batch
reads as a history of what was decided rather than emptying as it is
worked through. An acceptance cannot be undone from here: the question
exists, and deciding twice would make a second one.
No embeddings for drafts. A vector is for finding a question in the
bank, and a draft is not in the bank.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Two shapes, because a plan is asked to do two different things. Papers
are rehearsal: each block is drawn to the ABP's published weights, so
sitting one says something about how you would do on the day. Domains
are study: the board's twenty-four content areas in its own order and
carrying its own titles, each given the share of the plan the board
gives it on the exam.
Both were written, then run against the real bank, which found two bugs
a unit test on a clean fixture would not have. Domains 19 and 20 —
nephrology and genitourinary — both map to our "Nephrology & Urology",
so a question sat in two pools and was dealt twice; the deal now keeps a
record of what has gone. And chunking every question a domain has into
blocks of forty gave preventive care six blocks and the plan a hundred
and sixty, which is not a plan: blocks are shared out by weight, with at
least one per domain so nothing the board examines is left out.
Built on the live bank alongside what was already there: Boards: Full
Papers (12 × 40) and Boards: By Content Domain (27 blocks, 1069
questions). Nothing existing was touched.
Psychosocial Issues and Child Abuse and Neglect — 6% of the paper
between them — had no category of ours at all, so they could contribute
nothing. Both now exist, with sub-topics named from the board's own
subdomains, and all 24 domains map to categories.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The number beside a folder in Topic reading was a question count while
the browser lists articles, so "Hyperinflammatory Sepsis 4" meant four
questions and opened onto no reading at all. It counts what it opens
now, rolled up over the subtree, and a branch with nothing to read in it
is not offered — a folder with a number on it is a promise.
The hover card could not be reached. Its body was pointer-events: none,
on the idea that a hint should not sit between the reader and the link —
but the card is offset below the link and never covered it, while the
pointer travelling down to Split view crossed a body it could not enter,
so no mouseenter fired and the hide timer closed it on the way. The card
takes the pointer now, with a bridge across the gap.
And clicking the words opens the card rather than the article. A
cross-reference is read mid-sentence, and navigating away to find out
whether it was worth following is the thing that breaks the thread; the
card's two controls — beside what you are reading, or a tab for later —
are how you go. That also gives touch a route, where hover has none.
Modified and middle clicks are still the browser's.
The listing sent content and sections for all 331 articles, 214KB of
prose a list never renders. It sends what a list needs, which is 21KB.
The footer sat wherever the content stopped, so a page still loading put
it halfway up the screen with background below it. The shell is a column
the height of the window.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The tutor is handed the correct answer and the explanation and told it
may reveal them, which is why it has never been offered during a running
exam — require_question_access already refuses that, whatever anyone
sets. What was missing is the other half: an administrator can now
withhold it from study sessions too.
Enforced on the server rather than by hiding a button, because hiding a
button does not stop a request. Reviewing a finished attempt is not
"during" and is unaffected; the answers are shown by then anyway. If
Redis is unreachable the tutor stays on — nothing is revealed that study
mode does not already show, so the permissive direction is the safe one
here.
GET /teach/prompt renders the instructions against a stand-in question,
so an educator answering "why did the tutor say that?" can read them
rather than infer them.
And a handbook at /handbook, for anyone who maintains questions or
articles whatever access they hold. It answers the things that were only
in the code: that a question links to an article three different ways —
a further-reading row, a key point carrying an article and section, and
a [[id|label]] marker in prose keyed by id so renaming does not break it
— what the tutor is told, why a blueprint shapes a paper, why deleting a
question hides it, and why changing the embedding model invalidates
every vector.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The boxing was structural, not cosmetic. AdminSection wrapped AdminPage
in a Settings panel while AdminPage brought its own .card wrappers — a
box inside a box — and SettingsPage.css patched the symptom with
.set-admin > div > .card { border: 0 }. Both sections are written as
Settings sections now, the patch is deleted, and AdminPage with it.
People: no more refetch-everything. The old page called loadData() after
every change, pulling users, models and settings together and
re-rendering the section, which is what read as a page reload — there
was never a location.reload() to find. A change now updates the one row
it touched from what the server returned. The list searches, scrolls in
a bounded box, and will not let you change or delete your own account.
Models: the selection is rebuilt rather than restyled. Seven cards of
rows, each with Default, Test, Disable and Remove, meant four buttons to
express one fact. There are two decisions, so there are two places now —
which models the site may use at all is an allow-list you set once and
fold away, and which one does a given job is a single choice made where
the job is named. A job with one model offers no choice, because there
is none to make.
The embedding model moved in with the models, since it is one, and
Search — which held nothing else — is retired.
Settings fills the window: the panel column scrolls inside itself, so a
short section no longer ends two thirds of the way down a tall screen
and a long one no longer runs off the bottom. Below 700px the page
scrolls as one, as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Safety held one thing: rolling back the AI classification tag assignments. The
classifier is gone, so the panel had nothing left to be about and the section is
removed, along with the snapshot state and the rollback call that fed it.
Permissions — the other thing that section might have grown into — already have
a page in Access.
"Search and sign-up" carried two controls that live somewhere else: a Public
Registration toggle that Access and joining already owns, and an embedding model
field that belongs with the other models. The duplicate registration toggle is
gone and the section is now just Search.
The account menu no longer offers Administration. It pointed at /settings?s=people
— the same page the Settings entry above it opens — so it was two names for one
door. Settings already shows the site sections to an administrator.
Access: the branch tree opened its top level by default and ran to hundreds of
rows, which buried the image libraries below it. Every branch now starts closed,
opening one closes the one before it at the same depth, and the tree scrolls
inside a bounded box. Picking a different person collapses it again. A "Clear all
access" control removes every grant a person holds, including the everything
role, for starting over.
The standfirst is reworded to lead with what to do rather than with a definition.
Tests updated rather than worked around: the Settings test asserted Safety was a
section, and the Access test reached a child branch that is no longer open on
load. Both now assert the new behaviour, plus two new cases — that branches start
collapsed, and that opening one closes the previous. 346 frontend tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU
Four gaps, one change.
Articles could not belong to an exam at all — an article reached one only
by inference through its category, which cannot say that the same article
belongs to a basic-science step and a clinical one showing different
views in each. article_exam_links says whether it is in the group;
Exam.article_views already decided what is shown once you are there.
POST /exams/ wrote name, slug, sort order and active, and silently
dropped family, description and article views, so a new objective landed
in "Other" showing everything whatever was asked for. It writes what it
is given now, and PATCH can change it afterwards.
Membership was one link row at a time, which nobody would do for three
thousand questions. POST /exams/{id}/assign takes whole topics with
everything beneath them — questions and articles both — and is
idempotent, so widening a selection and running it again adds only what
is new.
And the point of all of it: a real paper is not a uniform draw. The ABP
publishes that 12% of a general paediatrics exam is preventive care and
2% is rheumatology; forty questions drawn evenly is forty coin flips.
exam_blueprints holds a board's published outline — its own numbering,
its headings, its weights — and blueprint_category_links maps it onto
our taxonomy rather than bending the tree to fit, because their outline
is arranged for examining and ours for studying.
The sampler uses largest-remainder, so twenty-four percentages still come
to forty questions, and a domain that cannot supply its share gives the
shortfall back to be spread over those that can — the paper keeps its
length and loses only accuracy, and the working is returned so the
shortfall is visible rather than silent.
Seeded from the ABP General Pediatrics Content Outline (Oct 2024):
structure and published weights only, no exam material. 120 lines, 22 of
24 domains mapped; Psychosocial Issues and Child Abuse and Neglect have
no category of ours and are reported rather than hidden.
Creating an objective is now an administrator's rather than a
moderator's: it appears in everyone's picker and scopes the whole bank,
which is site configuration, and it sits with the other site switches a
moderator cannot reach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Question ids come from a sequence and are never reissued, and fourteen
tables point at them — attempts, quiz membership, exam membership,
media, article links, notes, favourites, feedback. Deleting the row took
all of that with it, so "restore" could only ever have meant typing the
text in again as a different question.
DELETE now sets deleted_at. The question leaves the bank, the builder,
search and every share path at once, because the exclusion lives in
general_question_predicate rather than at each call site. Restoring puts
back the same id, so everything that pointed at it still does. Erasing
for real requires the trash first and a moderator, and the confirmation
says what goes with it.
The trash page holds questions instead of tests. A test is a selection
you can remake in a minute; nobody wanted those back.
Used and withdrawn invite codes can be removed — an unused one is still
withdrawn rather than deleted, so it stays visible as having been issued
and stopped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The section bar is 46px tall with overflow hidden, so an absolutely
positioned menu inside it was cropped to a strip and never appeared —
the same reason it looked wrong in a settings panel, which also clips
its own overflow. The menu is fixed now and the component measures the
button and places it, following resize and scroll.
In a settings panel there is no menu at all: the objective is stated
plainly with a Change button that opens the picker, which is an overlay
fixed to the viewport and so cannot be clipped by anything.
The taxonomy page no longer searches the question bank. Filing a
question is done where the question is; a search box on a taxonomy row
was a second, worse question bank.
The account page is gone. Settings opens on the account, so Account and
Settings were two doors to the same room; /account redirects. Admins get
an Administration entry in the person menu.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
It was still browsing the flat category list and the free-text keyword
tags, neither of which is how questions are arranged any more. A
discipline holding six hundred questions three levels down showed as
"(0)" because only what was filed directly on the node was counted.
/topics now walks the tree — discipline, sub-topic, condition — with
each node counted over its whole subtree, and any node can be quizzed
whole. /objective scopes every quiz to one exam, listing only objectives
that actually have questions. The keyword browse is gone with the tags.
Chat is where you answer, not where you read the teaching: explanations
are abridged to about a screenful, cut at a sentence, with markdown and
cross-reference markers stripped and a link to the site when there is
more. Per-option reasoning and figures are not sent — the bot never did,
and now says where they are.
Still read-only, and now says so: no account, no history, and a quiz
that lives only until it ends or /stop. `is_shared` remains the only
gate between an anonymous stranger and the bank, applied in one place.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Settings linked to a second dashboard with its own tab bar and its own
visual language. The admin sections are rendered in Settings now, under
headings that say who they are for — You, Content, The site — and each
has its own address, so People, AI models, Safety and Search are links.
/admin redirects into Settings for anyone who bookmarked it. AdminPage
takes a `section` prop and drops its tab row when embedded; it is loaded
lazily, so it is not in a learner's download.
Comments are gone: router, model, table and the half of the test file
that covered them. They were a discussion thread nobody was obliged to
answer, and feedback replaced them with a message addressed to whoever
maintains the question. The table was empty, so nothing was lost —
verified before dropping it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The switcher opened the whole picker on the first click. Now it opens a
short menu: what you are studying for, the objectives you have been on
lately (one click to switch back), and a way through to the full list.
"All content" is gone. Studying for nothing in particular is not an
objective, and the whole bank at once makes the filters and the analysis
mean less rather than more. Saving requires an objective to be chosen.
Suspending a session now lands on that session's analysis, where what
has been answered so far is scored and Resume sits, rather than on a
list of every session you own. A course quiz still returns to its course.
lazyPage() replaces lazy() for every route and lazily-loaded component.
Each build fingerprints the chunk filenames, so a tab still holding the
previous index.html asks for a file the new image does not have and the
user meets "This page failed to load" for a page that is fine. One
reload per tab fetches the new index; a failure that survives the reload
is shown, not looped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
A copy button tells you nothing about what you are about to send. The
dialog names the session, counts its questions and shows the stem it
opens on, then offers the link with Copy and the places people actually
send one — email, WhatsApp, Telegram.
Sharing is the administrator's to allow. GET /quizzes/share-policy is
asked before the dialog offers to make a link, so a switch that has been
thrown reads as "not offered" rather than as a button that fails when
pressed. A link already issued keeps working either way.
Removes the second, lesser share block that sat inside the save panel.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
