Live-run feedback: "Best-fit release: deezer (665666731), score 1.0" is too thin
to trust/accept. Each finding now explains WHY:
- score_release_detail() exposes the per-signal breakdown (count/duration/title)
instead of just the blended score.
- resolve_canonical_for_album returns an enriched result: the breakdown,
file_track_count vs release_track_count, and a `candidates` list of every
source it scored (so a finding can show what the winner beat).
- resolve_and_store adds album/artist/thumb context from the row it already
loaded (no extra query). Storage still only reads source/album_id/score.
- The job builds a real description via _describe_pin(), e.g.:
"Pin deezer release 665666731 (confidence 100%).
Fit to your library: 11 files vs 11 tracks on this release — track count
100%, durations 100%, titles 100%.
Beat: spotify 65% (17 tk)."
and a clearer title ("Pin deezer as canonical: <artist> — <album>").
Tests: resolver enrichment (breakdown + candidate comparison fields), and
_describe_pin (judge-able text incl. the beaten alternatives, and honest "n/a"
for a missing signal). 42 canonical tests pass.
Note: the description string carries the judge-able info regardless of UI; how
the findings tab renders the extra details keys (thumb image, candidates table)
is still UI-dependent and unverified.
ec8091caad