Two over-rejections that filtered out legit releases as "unknown quality":
- the source parser only matched WEB-DL/WEBDL, not plain "WEB" (very common)
- a release with a known resolution but no recognized source had no tier
Now plain WEB parses as web-dl, and a resolution-only release assumes web so
it lands on a tier instead of being rejected (ffprobe verifies the real quality
after download). Truly quality-less packs still reject. Tests added.
The shared judge both the Download modal and the later-phase engine will use:
core/video/quality_eval.py (pure, isolated) — resolution_rank/resolution_label,
meets_cutoff (loose resolution target), and evaluate_owned(file, profile) →
{meets, resolution_label, reasons[]}. A copy is 'below target' when its resolution
is under the loose cutoff, or its codec is on the reject list.
Exposed as POST /api/video/downloads/evaluate (loads the stored profile, judges the
posted file). 9 tests green, isolation guard green, ruff clean.
