9d307fd442
Some checks failed
Forgejo Android APK / Root app tests (push) Successful in 50s
Forgejo Docker Build / Root app tests (push) Successful in 1m2s
Forgejo Android APK / Build signed APK (push) Successful in 2m6s
Forgejo Docker Build / Build Docker image (push) Successful in 37s
Forgejo Docker Build / Deploy to the host (push) Failing after 0s
The model that writes a deck never sees it. It cannot tell that slide four overflowed, that a nine-item list would read better in two columns, or that two labelled groups want to be a comparison — those are facts about the rendered page, not about the text. So each generated deck is now rendered to PDF through Gotenberg, rasterised to one image per slide with pdftoppm, and shown to a vision model. Off unless an administrator names a reviewer, in its own admin card because it is the one setting that spends money on every generation without a user having asked for anything. One pass, on generation only: a second pass costs as much as the first and fixes far less, and refining is a text edit. It returns a patch, not a deck. Asking for the corrected deck back put the reply in proportion to the deck rather than to the number of problems, and a fourteen-slide deck came back cut off mid-object at every output budget the provider would honour — measured twice before changing shape. The patch is better for a second reason. The reviewer names a slide and an action — two columns, one column, split after bullet N, compare with these two labels — and the server moves the text it already has. The words never pass through the model, so a review cannot reword, drop or invent a single bullet. That is a stronger guarantee than instructing it not to and checking afterwards. The check runs anyway, because a bug in applyChanges would be as bad as a model rewriting the words and worse for being trusted: body text must come out the same multiset, figures the same set, and a heading may only be reused or extended. A continuation heading is the reviewer's one piece of text and is replaced when it does not continue anything. Nothing here can fail a generation — no reviewer, an unreachable one, an unparseable reply, a deck too long to look at, or a patch that applies to nothing each return the deck that was written. Verified end to end against a deck with a deliberately overloaded slide: three slides rendered and sent, one change returned, ten bullets split into five and five under "Stepwise Management … (continued)", text intact. Left switched off; enable it under Admin. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| .well-known | ||
| audio | ||
| components | ||
| css | ||
| data | ||
| icons | ||
| images/pe-guide | ||
| img | ||
| js | ||
| vendor | ||
| 404.html | ||
| e2e-harness.html | ||
| favicon.ico | ||
| index.html | ||
| manifest.json | ||
| sw.js | ||
| template-guide.md | ||