17 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Daniel	025290d64a	feat: retire Learning Hub ... My Resources generates better slides than Learning Hub ever did — a typed deck the model fills in, rendered by python-pptx with fit-to-slide text, figures, a vision review and themes, against Learning Hub's markdown-through-pandoc — and the articles and quizzes now live in the quiz app. Keeping a second, weaker generator and a whole CMS beside it was not earning its maintenance. Removed: three routers, the Learning Hub and Content Manager tabs, their components and frontend modules, the five database tables, the WebDAV browser, the content embedding column and its vector index. Content was exported first — every article as markdown plus a full SQL dump of all five tables — to ops-backups/learning-hub-export-*. That export is the restore path; the migration's down() can recreate the shape but never the rows, and says so. Two things this simplifies rather than merely deletes: generated_image_links existed only to record which published content an image appeared in, and it was the sole reason a generated image could be read by someone who did not make it. Images are now owner-only — the visibility rule is one WHERE clause instead of a join across two tables and a published flag. embeddings.js keeps the model discovery the admin panel uses and loses searchSimilar and generateContentEmbedding, which queried a table that no longer exists. Kept deliberately: Nextcloud connect, disconnect and export, which are how a generated note reaches a real filesystem and have nothing to do with Learning Hub; learningRetrieval, which despite its name is the clinical corpus search My Resources depends on; and the pandoc reference deck, still the fallback when the python renderer fails, moved from assets/learning to assets/deck now that the old name misleads. Tests: four Learning-Hub-only files removed, and the individual cases inside shared files that asserted its behaviour. Where a test used a Learning endpoint only as a convenient example — the account-boundary token test, the policy matrix — it now uses one that still exists, so the property it proves is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 20:14:20 +02:00
Daniel	83206e907c	fix: a second deck reused the first deck's pictures ... The image job key was the request-body hash plus the figure's position — slide index for a deck, reply index for a document. Two generations from the same form produce the same body hash, so figure 4 of the second generation collided with figure 4 of the first on the unique (owner, workflow, idempotency_key). The constraint handed back the existing job, and the new deck displayed the old deck's artwork. The decks are not even the same length, so the reused picture could land on a slide about something else entirely. Keyed on what is being drawn now: the body hash stays, so submitting the identical request twice still dedupes rather than billing twice, and a hash of the prompt (plus layout and shape) is what makes two different pictures two different jobs. Same fix in deckBuild and resourceImages. Also split fileLog out of logger. logger requires the database at module load, so importing it to record a diagnostic pulls in a connection pool — wrong on its own terms, and it hung the whole test suite when imageTool started logging its refusals: a unit test that never touches a database inherited an open pool handle and never exited. logger.file now delegates to fileLog, so there is still one implementation of where a line goes and how it is redacted. With that in place, every image-tool refusal is recorded durably. There are five of them, they want five different fixes, and until now none of them left any trace once the container was replaced. Verified against a mutation: restoring the index-based key fails two of the four collision tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 08:26:09 +02:00
Daniel	e244ee5240	feat: modifying a deck can see it ... The model editing a deck could not see it, which made most of what people actually ask for unanswerable: "that slide is too crowded", "the diagram is in the wrong place", "this one looks empty" are facts about the rendered page, not about the JSON. When a vision model is configured, modifying now renders the current deck — with its figures, unlike the review pass, which runs while they are still being drawn — and hands the model one image per slide alongside the JSON. Same pipeline as review, reused rather than reimplemented: pptx, Gotenberg, PDF, pdftoppm, capped at MAX_SLIDES. The vision model then does the editing, which is a second and separately measured benefit. On a real 20-slide deck, ds-deepseek-v4-flash returned the deck unchanged for "make it better" — the echo reported yesterday — while openrouter-gemini-3.8-flash applied it. So the stronger model fixes the echo even without sight. A model the author picks explicitly still wins over both. The result is rendered and reviewed again. Generation-only was the old rule, on the reasoning that refining is a text edit; it is not. The edit is made against how the deck looked before it, so a slide that gains two bullets only overflows once it is rendered again. The reviewer may reposition but is held to the same words, so a verification pass cannot quietly undo what was just asked for. Whether an instruction achieved anything is judged on the model's edit, before the reviewer runs, or a reviewer nudging a slide into two columns would mask an instruction that did nothing. Sight is an upgrade, never a dependency: no vision model, Gotenberg down, a render that fails — each falls through to editing blind, and a test covers each of those paths. Verified against two mutations: keeping the text model when images are attached, and dropping the verification pass, each fail exactly one test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 06:55:16 +02:00
Daniel	3ec65a91f6	fix: a figure asked for while modifying a deck now belongs to a slide ... Ticking "Add illustrations" on Modify offered the image tool regardless of what was being edited. The tool returns job ids and has no way to place them, which is fine for markdown — there is nowhere to put a figure in markdown anyway — and wrong for a deck, where figures are placed by a slide declaring them. So modifying a deck with illustrations on generated a figure, paid for it, recorded it against the resource, and referenced it from nothing. Measured: one figure recorded, zero referenced by a slide, and absent from the export. Deck mode now asks the revised deck to declare its figures and draws them with the same drawFigures() generation uses, so each one belongs to the slide that wanted it. Slides that already have a figure keep it. The tool path stays for markdown resources, where it is the only option. Verified: the same modification now records one figure, one slide references it, and the exported deck embeds one image. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 01:24:40 +02:00
Daniel	012346528c	fix: generation stopped working whenever the slide reviewer was switched off ... savedFigureIds was declared inside the review branch, so with no reviewer configured — the default, and what everyone is running — it was undefined by the time the INSERT stringified it. JSON.stringify(undefined) is not a string, the column is NOT NULL, and every generation failed with "Generation failed". `var` is function-scoped, so nothing complained until the database did. This is the second bug of exactly this shape in this file, so the test asserts position rather than presence: the value must be declared before both the review and the insert read it. Found by the logging added in the same change, which is the other half of this commit. Every modification now says what it did: [my-resources] refine id=29 path=deck outcome=applied 13→14 slides changed=yes [my-resources] refine id=37 path=markdown outcome=applied 2635→3018 chars changed=yes CHANGED=no is warn-level and deliberately shouty, because that is the failure worth catching: the response says success either way, the row updates, and the download is identical — which is exactly how the deck bug went unnoticed. A refusal logs its reason. ped_ai_resource_refine_total{path,outcome} counts the same thing over time, so "did that modification do anything" is answerable without watching logs live. Verified across every path rather than the one that was broken: a deck presentation modified and exported to both pptx and docx carries the change; a legacy presentation with no stored deck still takes the markdown path and carries it; an article generates, modifies and exports; and a presentation generates with the reviewer off. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 00:57:30 +02:00
Daniel	f66daf0c02	fix: modifying a presentation changes the presentation, not just its markdown ... Export renders a presentation from its stored deck. Refine edited the markdown beside it and never touched the deck — so a modification reported success, updated the title and the library row, and produced a byte-identical download. Nothing said otherwise. It looked like the model had ignored the instruction. Measured before the fix, with a marker that was definitely not in the deck: refine succeeded, the stored markdown gained the new slide, the stored deck did not, and the exported pptx did not. After: the export gains the slide and the marker, twelve slides where there were eleven. A presentation with a stored deck is now edited as a deck — the deck goes to the model, a revised deck comes back, and the markdown is serialised from it, which is the same direction generation runs in. Layouts, custom slides and image_job values survive a modification instead of being flattened away. A reply that is not a usable deck is refused rather than saved as markdown: saving it would drop every layout the deck held while looking like it worked, which is the failure this commit exists to remove. Articles have no deck and keep the markdown path unchanged. The reply restates the whole resource, so the token budget is raised to match — the old default was already close to truncating a long deck's markdown. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 23:55:27 +02:00
Daniel	087f717f55	feat: the model designs the deck instead of writing markdown for a parser to guess at ... Markdown could express about five of the things the renderer can draw, so the model had no way to say "put this figure beside these three bullets" or "make this a comparison with two labelled columns" — my parser inferred a layout from the shape of a list, and inferring is what made every deck look the same. A presentation is now described as a deck: the model returns JSON naming a layout per slide and the prompt it wants each figure drawn from. Four layouts were added to the renderer for it — two tinted labelled columns for a comparison, a callout card for a red flag or a dose, a figure beside its bullets, and a full-slide figure. Articles stay markdown, which is what prose wants. Markdown is still produced, serialised from the deck, so Word export and text editing keep working and the stored artifact stays readable by a person. The deck is stored alongside it because that serialisation is lossy by design: round-tripping through markdown would throw away exactly the layout choices this was built to capture. A resource made before this, or an article forced into slides, still renders by inferring from its markdown. Nothing here can cost more than the thing that went wrong. A reply that is not a deck falls back to asking for markdown rather than saving the model's apology; a malformed slide degrades to bullets rather than throwing; a comparison with one column is not a comparison; a figure that cannot be queued leaves a slide of text rather than an empty frame; and JSON wrapped in fences or a covering sentence is read rather than refused. Verified live on "croup versus epiglottitis": the model chose section, bullets, table, compare, figure, callout and image layouts across thirteen slides, and the exported deck was rendered to PDF, rasterised and looked at — the comparison renders as two tinted cards, the red flag as a callout, and the figure sits beside its bullets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 19:49:55 +02:00
Daniel	73ce4049d4	feat: decks are built with python-pptx instead of pandoc, and carry their figures ... Pandoc's pptx writer was the ceiling on how good a generated deck could be, and the model on top made no difference to it. It maps markdown onto a handful of reference layouts with no per-slide layout, no positioning and no control over how large an image is drawn, which is why every deck came out as bullets on a template — and why autofit had to be injected into its emitted OOXML by hand afterwards, because LibreOffice ignores the autofit pandoc leaves off. scripts/render_pptx.py draws the deck and src/utils/slideSpec.js decides what each slide is. Markdown stays the stored artifact, so "change slide 4" is still a text edit and Word export is untouched — pandoc still writes docx, where its output is good. What that buys, all of it visible in a rendered deck rather than argued for: - 16:9, not pandoc's 4:3. - A pipe table becomes a real table with a header band and banded rows, not eight lines of text with pipes in them. - A list longer than seven items becomes two columns instead of a wall of text. - Text is measured and sized to fit before the file is written, so nothing depends on a renderer honouring autofit. - Wrapped lines hang under the text instead of running back to the margin, which is the clearest single tell that a deck was generated. - An image is drawn at its own aspect ratio, centred, with a caption. Figures now reach the deck at all, which they never did. They were queued and shown on the page, but nothing recorded that they belonged to the resource, so an export could not include them: user_resources.image_ids holds them, a modification adds to that list rather than replacing it, and export fetches the finished ones to a scratch directory. They are spread through the deck rather than appended, because ending on three unexplained pictures is worse than showing each near its material, and a References slide stays last. If the renderer fails for any reason, pandoc still produces a deck — a plainer deck beats a failed download. Verified end to end: a seven-slide request with three figures exported as a 13-page deck; the slides were rendered to PDF, rasterised and looked at. All three formats still download. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 19:34:26 +02:00
Daniel	1ad72b134b	feat: a resource can have several illustrations, on its own path ... My Resources used imageTool.dispatch, which permits exactly one image per request — "Only one image tool invocation is permitted per request". That is the right rule for a chat reply and the wrong one for a twelve-slide deck where the author asked for three figures. Rather than relax a limit the clinical assistant and the Learning Hub also depend on, this adds a separate dispatcher for this feature. Same queue, same storage, same my_resources workflow, same asset endpoint — only the number of figures differs, bounded at six because each one is a paid request. "Use 3 diagrams" in the instructions is read as the number it is, and the illustration option now says several are possible rather than promising one. Three things had to be got right, each found by measuring rather than assuming: The illustration guidance has to be the last thing in the prompt. Placed before the output rules it lost — with the tool offered and the paragraph present, the model returned 3297 characters of markdown and zero tool calls, while the same tool and wording in a shorter prompt produced three calls. Even last, it loses to a prompt carrying thirty library excerpts: deterministically, with the library off "use 3 diagrams" made three calls and with the library on it made none and wrote a longer deck instead. So when the author names a number the call is required rather than merely offered. With no number named the choice stays the model's. And a model that has just made three tool calls tends to sign off instead of writing: "I'll create the presentation and the three teaching diagrams." was returned as the resource — 61 characters — because only a completely empty body counted as missing. A body with no title block and no heading is not a Pandoc document whatever its length, and if the continuation is no better than the first attempt, whichever actually reads like a resource is kept. Verified end to end with the library on: generate produced three figures and an eight-slide deck; modify added two more figures and a ninth slide. The figures were fetched and looked at — labelled airway anatomy, and a croup/epiglottitis/ bacterial tracheitis comparison. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 19:19:22 +02:00
Daniel	055a86bbb1	feat: My Resources says what it is, offers its sources in one place, and Modify gets them too ... The screen had been trimmed to controls with no explanation of what it was for; "Private to you" said who could see it, not what it did. It now opens with a sentence that says what you get and how you get it out, and the header reads "Only you can see these". The four choices — clinical library, PubMed, web, illustration — are one "Draw on" group instead of four separate rows, with the library ticked by default. Each option hides itself when an administrator has not enabled it, so nothing appears that a person could tick and then be refused. Modify offers exactly the same choices. It had none, so "add what the 2024 trial showed" was answered from the model's memory rather than by looking anything up. Generate and Modify now go through one gatherSources(), so they cannot drift into offering different things or searching them differently. Writing "include a diagram of the airway" in the instructions now switches the illustration option on and says why, rather than the request being dropped in silence. Switching it off by hand sticks — the hint then reminds instead of fighting — and when no image model is configured it says so rather than pretending. Both the generate and modify boxes behave this way. Two things found by testing this rather than assuming it. PubMed ANDs every mapped term, so one unrecognised word takes the query to zero. "febrile seizures" returns six results and "febrile seizures in under-fives" returns none; "the anatomy of croup: subglottic narrowing and the steeple sign" returned none until it was narrowed to "anatomy croup", which returns six. A query that finds nothing is now retried against progressively shorter versions of itself, longest first, and the response says which query actually worked so the screen cannot report one that found nothing. Those extra calls tripped NCBI's three-a-second limit and produced a 429, so retries are spaced and the first attempt waits for nothing. Separately, the searches run on the topic while the library retrieval also gets the instruction: retrieval is semantic and benefits from the context, but a keyword engine handed a whole sentence returns nothing. And when a search was asked for and came back empty, the prompt now says not to invent a citation, a PMID or a URL to fill the gap. Without that the model supplies them from memory, and a fabricated PMID looks exactly like a real one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 18:54:17 +02:00
Daniel	5577ec301c	refactor: cut the explanatory copy from the sign-in screen and My Resources ... The HIPAA notice is gone from the auth screen, along with the CSS rule that had no other user. The My Resources intro paragraph and the helper paragraphs under each checkbox are gone too; where a paragraph carried something the reader actually needed, it moved onto the control itself — the illustration checkbox now says what it does and where to steer it. Two sentences were kept rather than deleted, both about data leaving the building: that a web search query leaves this network and must not carry anything identifying, and that a PubMed query goes to NCBI. Trimmed to one line each. Say the word and they go too, but a clinical tool should not quietly send a query off-network with nothing on screen about it. The three tests that pinned the removed sentences now assert the behaviour instead: that the header still claims privacy, and that the illustration checkbox is genuinely unchecked in the markup rather than merely described as off by default. Verified as rendered: neither the sign-in nor the sign-up screen mentions HIPAA, the invite-code field is visible, and the generator card is down to its controls plus the NCBI line. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 17:57:07 +02:00
Daniel	8cca5a4796	feat: instructions can ask for the illustration; library scrolls and searches; Modify ... Three things to My Resources. Illustration was entirely the model's call: someone who wanted a figure of something particular had no way to say so, because the instructions steered the prose and nothing else. The illustration guidance now tells the model to follow the author's instructions when they ask for a figure or name what it should show, and to treat that as the decision already made. Verified live: "include a diagram showing the age distribution and the simple-versus-complex distinction" produced exactly that, both halves in one figure. Exactly one image per generation is a real limit, not a wording choice — the shared imageTool dispatcher rejects more than one tool call per request, and it is used by the assistant and Learning Hub too. So the prompt says to draw the single most useful one if several are asked for, and the screen says the same. The library was an unbounded list that pushed everything below it off the page. It is now a 360px scrolling box with a search over title and topic, filtered locally because the rows are already in hand. "Nothing yet" and "nothing matches" are different messages, because telling someone whose search missed that they have never generated anything is wrong. Measured in a real render: 360px visible of 642px of content, and searching narrows 10 rows to 3. Modify is new UI over the refine endpoint, which existed with no way to reach it. Pick a resource, say what to change, and it is rewritten in place keeping its id, its downloads and its References section. The picker is built from the same library array, so it cannot drift, and a selection survives the refresh that follows a generation. Verified live: "add a Key Takeaways slide before References" inserted exactly that and left the other four slides alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 17:49:27 +02:00
Daniel	1270899dcb	feat: PubMed search for My Resources, and an image tool that actually fires ... PubMed joins web search as an optional source for a generated resource: a literature search on the topic, with abstracts, cited by PMID in References. Off by default, admin-enabled, with its own optional API key (NCBI raises the rate limit from 3/sec to 10/sec; it works without one). Neither search is a tool any more, and that is the point. Offering them as function calls meant the model decided whether to search, and with a prompt ending "Output ONLY Pandoc markdown" it decided not to — every time, with and without corpus grounding, no matter how the tool description was worded. Calling callAI with the tool directly produced a correct pubmed_search call, so the plumbing was never the problem. The search only ever needed the topic, and the route knows the topic before it calls the model, so both searches now run up front and their results go into the prompt as findings, exactly the way corpus excerpts do. Ticking the box now means the search happened. Verified live against deepseek-v4-flash: 30 corpus excerpts and 6 PubMed results, and a References slide carrying both the library sources and four real PMIDs (29562151, 38506440, 35721052, 28814254). Three fixes to illustration, which had never once fired: - The dispatch call had been lost in a refactor. The tool was still offered, the model still called it, and the call was dropped, so no job was ever enqueued. - imageContext was passed as a bare topic string where dispatch expects { request, history }, which made the bound request undefined. - The prompt never mentioned the tool existed while explicitly demanding only markdown — the same suppression that killed the searches. It now says an illustration is available and that calling it is not a violation of that rule. my_resources is its own image workflow rather than a reuse of learning_hub, because generated_image_links only accepts learning_hub assets, and that is exactly the barrier that keeps a private illustration out of published content. The illustration renders in the panel, rather than a toast pointing at an image history this feature does not have. Verified end to end: job queued, rendered, and the asset served to its owner as a correctly labelled subglottic-anatomy teaching diagram. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 16:47:08 +02:00
Daniel	571a013d29	feat: optional web search, admin-enabled and off by default ... The one feature here that sends text outside the building, so the defaults are the careful ones: disabled unless an administrator turns it on, opt-in per generation even then, and the option is hidden entirely rather than shown as something a user can tick and be refused. Only the search query leaves. Library excerpts, the generated resource and anything about the user never do. Both screens say so plainly, because a topic typed while drafting clinical material can carry clinical detail and the provider keeps its own logs. Four providers behind one shape, so swapping changes nothing downstream: Tavily, Serper over Google, Brave, and SearXNG — the only one where the query does not reach a commercial third party at all, which is why it is worth supporting even though it needs somewhere to run. The tool description says when NOT to search, because a model handed a search tool will reach for it constantly: not for settled clinical knowledge, which is what the indexed library is for, and one search per resource. That last one is enforced in the route with toolChoice: 'none' on the continuation rather than trusted to the model. A failed search never fails a generation — same contract as corpus retrieval. The resource is written without it and the response says what was searched for and what came back, so a query that left the network is visible rather than silent. The API key is masked on read and preserved when the field is left blank, the handling the OIDC client secret already gets, so changing provider cannot silently wipe a working key. Verified on the running instance: with nothing configured, webSearchAvailable is false, and a request asking for it anyway is ignored rather than honoured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 15:47:06 +02:00
Daniel	7eca509b02	fix: slides shrink to fit, and an article is never offered as slides ... A generated deck was losing content. pandoc writes a bare <a:bodyPr/> on every shape, which leaves the body with no autofit even though the slide master has one, so a slide with too much on it is cut off mid-sentence and the rest is not rendered at all. Reproduced and counted: eight bullets went in, three came out, the third ending mid-word. Every generated deck now carries <a:normAutofit/> on its body placeholders. No fontScale, deliberately — the renderer works out the reduction, so a slide that already fits is untouched, where a fixed scale would shrink all of them. The same eight bullets now fit with nothing in the bottom 6% of the slide. This is a floor, not a licence to overcrowd. The prompt still asks for one idea per slide; this stops a long one becoming unreadable. Also: an article is no longer offered as PowerPoint. A deck of paragraphs is not a presentation. Word and PDF suit either kind, and the route refuses the combination rather than relying on the button being absent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 15:34:16 +02:00
Daniel	fac8757ce8	feat: My Resources has a menu, a library and three downloads ... The pathway existed but was reachable only by API. It now has a tab of its own next to the Learning Hub — related, not the same thing, and sitting together is how someone discovers the difference — visible to every signed-in user with no role gate in the markup. Generate a deck or an article, see everything you have made, download each as PowerPoint, Word or PDF, delete what you no longer want. The screen says "Private to you" and "Nobody else sees these", because the distinction from published Learning content is the thing a person needs to understand before typing a patient's condition into it. Downloads are fetched rather than linked: an <a href> cannot carry the Authorization header. The blob is saved under the filename the server chose and the object URL is revoked afterwards. Resource titles come from a model, so rows are built as elements and a title is only ever assigned to textContent. The e2e stack now joins danvics_convert too. It could previously reach only Postgres and Redis, so a PDF download failed there in a way production would not — which did at least prove the degradation path works: with Gotenberg unreachable the response is "PDF conversion is unavailable right now. PowerPoint and Word still work", and the other two formats download unaffected. Verified in a browser as an ordinary user: the tab appears and opens, the form swaps slide count for word count when the format changes, the library lists their own work, and pptx, docx and pdf all download with sensible filenames (36360, 13285 and 68310 bytes). Also documents retrieval sizing in docs/retrieval-tuning.md — the per-feature budgets, and RERANKER_TOP_K, which caps all of them and had until now appeared in no configuration file at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 15:00:19 +02:00
Daniel	a0d81789ff	feat: My Resources — anyone can generate teaching material, privately ... Learning is moderator-owned: content published into categories that everyone sees, behind router.use(moderatorMiddleware). That is right for institutional material and wrong as the only way in — an ordinary user could not generate anything at all. So this is a separate pathway rather than a loosening of that one. Learning is untouched; the moderator gate stays exactly where it was. A signed-in user can generate a deck or an article for their own use, keep it, refine it and export it, and nobody else ever sees it. Private by construction. Every statement filters on the owner and there is no route that returns another person's work, which a test asserts statement by statement rather than trusting. The foreign key cascades, so deleting an account takes its drafts with it. There is no category, no publish state and no sharing: adding sharing later should be a deliberate feature, not something that leaks out of a forgotten WHERE clause. Markdown is the artifact. Every format is rendered from it on demand — pptx and docx by pandoc, both carrying the house reference deck, and PDF by Gotenberg, whose LibreOffice preserves a deck's layout in a way rendering from markdown would not. That is what makes "add a slide on when to admit" a text edit rather than a binary patch. Gotenberg was published on the host but on a network of its own, so reaching it from a container went out and back through the host gateway. It now joins danvics_convert, owned by danvics-net like the others. PDF is the one export allowed to fail: if that service is down, the deck and the document still download and the error says which. Verified end to end as a plain user: the moderator route still refuses with 403, generation returned a deck grounded on 12 corpus excerpts, the library lists only their own, pptx/docx/pdf all downloaded valid, "add a slide on when to admit" put the slide in the right place and left References last, and an unauthenticated request gets 401 while someone else's id gets 404. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-11 14:50:54 +02:00