6 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Daniel	5f738fbe30	feat: a theme is shown by a sample deck you download, not a picture ... A picture of one slide answers a narrower question than the one a theme picker is asked. What a person wants to know is what a deck will look like in this theme — all of it, at the size it will be shown, with the fonts substituted the way they will be. One rendered slide showed one layout, in content someone then read instead of looking at. So: a sample deck per theme. Every layout the renderer can draw — title, bullets with a sub-point, both two-column forms, table, callout, figure, full-slide figure, section divider, a custom slide with shapes, an arrow and a chart, and a references slide — with filler text throughout. Download it, open it, see the theme. The text is deliberately meaningless. Clinical content in a specimen invites you to read it, and then you are judging the teaching rather than the type; that is what the old croup slide got wrong. No engine. The previous preview needed a Gotenberg round trip and a pdftoppm to produce a PNG, cached on disk because of what it cost, and could fail in ways a missing picture cannot explain. python-pptx builds the file in ~330ms and PowerPoint draws it. The link is a plain anchor, so it is there whether or not anything on the server is well. The figure placeholder rides the same path a generated figure does — attachFigures downgrades a figure slide with no picture to bullets and an image slide to a section, so without it the sample would silently stop showing those two layouts. Verified: all five themes build, 11 slides, the chart is a real chart and the placeholder embeds as real media. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 22:24:05 +02:00
Daniel	24c8d71b7e	feat: send a resource to your own Nextcloud, as the rendered file ... A .pptx landing in someone's own storage is worth having; a markdown blob is not, and it is not what they would have downloaded. So this renders through exactly the path the download uses — stored deck, its figures, the chosen theme — and PUTs the bytes. The file never travels through the browser. Offered only when a Nextcloud is connected: an action that always fails is worse than one that is not offered. An article offers Word, a deck PowerPoint, and asking for slides from an article is refused with the reason. Putting a file in Nextcloud now lives in src/utils/nextcloudFiles.js. Two callers want it and neither should grow its own copy of the WebDAV dance — make the dated folder a segment at a time, PUT, migrate a legacy plaintext token — because it reaches into storage that is not ours and a second slightly different copy is how the two drift. It also replaces a route importing another route. Also: a model that leaves the roster now leaves every list that names it. clinical_assistant.allowed_models and the image roster are advisory copies of the roster, and a stale id there was invisible until someone asked a clinical question and the request failed at the gateway. Removing or disabling a model prunes it; clearing the roster clears them. Re-enabling deliberately does not re-allow it — that is a separate decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 20:34:58 +02:00
Daniel	e244ee5240	feat: modifying a deck can see it ... The model editing a deck could not see it, which made most of what people actually ask for unanswerable: "that slide is too crowded", "the diagram is in the wrong place", "this one looks empty" are facts about the rendered page, not about the JSON. When a vision model is configured, modifying now renders the current deck — with its figures, unlike the review pass, which runs while they are still being drawn — and hands the model one image per slide alongside the JSON. Same pipeline as review, reused rather than reimplemented: pptx, Gotenberg, PDF, pdftoppm, capped at MAX_SLIDES. The vision model then does the editing, which is a second and separately measured benefit. On a real 20-slide deck, ds-deepseek-v4-flash returned the deck unchanged for "make it better" — the echo reported yesterday — while openrouter-gemini-3.8-flash applied it. So the stronger model fixes the echo even without sight. A model the author picks explicitly still wins over both. The result is rendered and reviewed again. Generation-only was the old rule, on the reasoning that refining is a text edit; it is not. The edit is made against how the deck looked before it, so a slide that gains two bullets only overflows once it is rendered again. The reviewer may reposition but is held to the same words, so a verification pass cannot quietly undo what was just asked for. Whether an instruction achieved anything is judged on the model's edit, before the reviewer runs, or a reviewer nudging a slide into two columns would mask an instruction that did nothing. Sight is an upgrade, never a dependency: no vision model, Gotenberg down, a render that fails — each falls through to editing blind, and a test covers each of those paths. Verified against two mutations: keeping the text model when images are attached, and dropping the verification pass, each fail exactly one test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 06:55:16 +02:00
Daniel	491a2b0811	fix: the My Resources diagnostics survive a deploy ... logRefine writes the one line that answers "did that modification change anything" — path, before and after size, CHANGED=yes/no, figures, model, instruction. It went to console, so it lived in the container's stdout and was destroyed the next time the container was recreated. That cost a diagnosis today: a modification came back unchanged, the user asked why, and the evidence had already been deleted by a deploy. The deck-fallback warnings and the deck-vocabulary gaps had the same problem, and those exist specifically to be read later — the vocabulary gaps are meant to show which shapes to build next, which is a question about weeks, not about one container. All of them now go through logger, which writes the dated file in the scribe-logs volume and ships to Loki when it is configured, and carries the event as structured data rather than only as a formatted string. console.error is left alone: those are failures, and logger.error already echoes to the console. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 06:09:34 +02:00
Daniel	07d1c541a0	fix: a deck the model fumbles once is asked for again, not abandoned ... A presentation is generated as a typed deck — the model chooses each slide's layout — and that deck is what scripts/render_pptx.py renders. When the reply did not parse as a deck, the route fell straight back to asking for markdown, and slideSpec.build() then inferred slides from it. Both paths go through python-pptx, but the fallback's layout is guessed from heading and list structure rather than chosen, so everything lands as title-and-bullets. Measured on the stored library: since decks landed, 7 of 8 generations produced one and 1 did not. Models are stochastic, so one unlucky reply was costing the whole layout. It now asks a second time with the same prompt before giving up. The fallback was also invisible. It warned to the console, where the person who would simply have generated again could not see it, so they kept the plainer deck without knowing a better one was one click away. The response now carries deckFallback and the UI says it came out as plain slides, and why. Fixed the reason heuristic while adding tests for it: truncation was claimed for any reply not ending in "}", which is every prose refusal. It is now only claimed for a reply that began as JSON and stopped. The four generate tests run the handler. Verified against a mutation: removing the retry fails tests 6 and 7 and nothing else. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 05:34:14 +02:00
Daniel	e69eb9a9f7	fix: modifying a presentation failed whenever illustration was ticked ... existingDeck was declared below the branch that reads it, so `var` hoisting made it undefined there. With illustration on, a deck modification therefore appended the *markdown* instruction — "Returning the markdown is still required; a tool call is not a substitute for it" — to a prompt whose body asked for deck JSON. The model was told to produce two different artifacts in one reply, the reply parsed as neither, and deckBuild.parse returned null, so the handler answered 502 "That change could not be applied." Moved the declaration above its first reader. Same class of fault as the savedFigureIds one, in the same file. Two things made it hard to see, both fixed: - The library row read created_at, so a modification that did apply left the visible timestamp on the generation time. That timestamp is what led to "modification doesn't work" — it was the only signal available, and it was reading the wrong column. Rows now show the modified time when there is one. - A model can also return the document back unchanged. That was logged server-side and answered "Applied. Download it to see the result", which sent people to download an identical file. The response now carries `unchanged` and the UI says so, keeping the instruction in the box so it can be reworded. Also surfaced has_deck on the library list: 28 of 38 stored presentations have no deck and go through the weaker flat-markdown path, and nothing in the UI distinguished them. They now read "plain text, no slide layout". test/my-resources-refine.test.js runs the handler rather than reading it, since all three faults were invisible to source reading. Verified against a mutation: putting the declaration back where it was fails test 1 and nothing else. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dv6sqaY6Vq3ChZHMem3cnU	2026-09-12 05:05:39 +02:00