merge: modifying a resource is a job
Some checks failed
Forgejo Docker Build / Root app tests (push) Successful in 49s
Forgejo Docker Build / Build Docker image (push) Successful in 6s
Forgejo Docker Build / End-to-end (browser) (push) Failing after 6s

This commit is contained in:
Daniel 2026-09-16 23:28:42 +02:00
commit 39272f17c8
8 changed files with 344 additions and 281 deletions

View file

@ -381,6 +381,29 @@
var r = job.result || {};
var g = r.grounding || {};
var title = (r.resource && r.resource.title) || job.topic;
// A modification reports itself exactly as it did when the request waited for
// it; only where the answer arrives has changed.
if (job.kind === 'refine') {
// The model can return the document back unchanged. That is a failed
// modification, and saying "Applied" for it sent people off to download
// an identical file and conclude the feature was broken.
if (r.unchanged) {
status('“' + title + '”: the model returned it unchanged — nothing was modified. ' +
'Try naming the slide or section to change, and what to change about it.', 'bad');
} else {
// Whether it could see the slides is worth saying: it is the difference
// between "slide 4 looks crowded" being actionable and being guesswork,
// and it explains why this took longer.
status('“' + title + '” modified' +
(r.saw ? ', after looking at all ' + r.saw + ' slides' : '') +
(g.used ? ', using ' + g.count + ' library excerpt' + (g.count === 1 ? '' : 's') : '') +
'. Download it to see the result.', 'good');
}
reportSearches(r.searches);
showIllustrations(r.imageJobs || []);
reportImageFailures(r.imageFailures);
return;
}
status('“' + title + '” is in your library. ' + (g.used
? 'Written from ' + g.count + ' library excerpt' + (g.count === 1 ? '' : 's') + '.'
: 'Not grounded' + (g.reason ? ' — ' + g.reason : '') + '; written from the model alone.'),
@ -415,11 +438,12 @@
icon.style.color = busy ? 'var(--g600)' : job.status === 'done' ? 'var(--green)' : 'var(--red)';
var label = document.createElement('span');
label.style.cssText = 'flex:1;min-width:0;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;white-space:nowrap;';
label.textContent = job.topic + ' · ' + (job.kind === 'article' ? 'article' : 'presentation');
label.textContent = job.topic + ' · ' + (job.kind === 'refine' ? 'modification'
: job.kind === 'article' ? 'article' : 'presentation');
var state = document.createElement('span');
state.style.cssText = 'color:var(--g600);white-space:nowrap;';
state.textContent = job.status === 'queued' ? 'Queued'
: job.status === 'running' ? 'Writing… ' + elapsed(job)
: job.status === 'running' ? (job.kind === 'refine' ? 'Rewriting… ' : 'Writing… ') + elapsed(job)
: job.status === 'done' ? 'Done'
: 'Failed — ' + (job.error || 'Generation failed');
row.appendChild(icon); row.appendChild(label); row.appendChild(state);
@ -864,6 +888,11 @@
if (btn) { btn.disabled = true; btn.innerHTML = '<i class="fas fa-spinner fa-spin"></i> Applying'; }
clearResults();
say('Rewriting…');
// Queued like a generation, not awaited. A revision restates the whole
// resource and can take minutes; a request held open that long is abandoned
// by the browser while the server carries on, which is exactly how a
// modification looked like it had failed and then really had been saved.
// The job list reports it, so leaving the page no longer loses the work.
fetch('/api/my-resources/' + encodeURIComponent(id) + '/refine', {
method: 'POST',
headers: getAuthHeaders(),
@ -879,29 +908,9 @@
.then(function (r) { return r.json(); })
.then(function (data) {
if (!data.success) throw new Error(data.error || 'Could not apply the changes');
// Same reporting as generating: what it was written from, what was
// searched, and any figure that came back.
var g = data.grounding || {};
// The model can return the document back unchanged. That is a failed
// modification, and saying "Applied" for it sent people off to download
// an identical file and conclude the feature was broken.
if (data.unchanged) {
say('The model returned it unchanged — nothing was modified. ' +
'Try naming the slide or section to change, and what to change about it.', 'bad');
} else {
// Whether it could see the slides is worth saying: it is the
// difference between "slide 4 looks crowded" being actionable and
// being guesswork, and it explains why this took longer.
say('Applied' +
(data.saw ? ', after looking at all ' + data.saw + ' slides' : '') +
(g.used ? ', using ' + g.count + ' library excerpt' + (g.count === 1 ? '' : 's') : '') +
'. Download it to see the result.', 'good');
}
reportSearches(data.searches);
showIllustrations(data.imageJobs || []);
reportImageFailures(data.imageFailures);
if (box && !data.unchanged) box.value = '';
loadLibrary();
say('Rewriting in the background. You can leave this page — it keeps going.', 'good');
if (box) box.value = '';
refreshJobs();
})
.catch(function (err) { say(err.message, 'bad'); })
.finally(function () {

View file

@ -574,15 +574,32 @@ function httpError(statusCode, message) {
// job; a runaway click is not.
var MAX_ACTIVE_JOBS = 3;
// One writer at a time, counted across generating and modifying alike: a
// modification does the same library search and the same long model call as a
// generation, so letting ten of them run at once is the cost the cap bounds.
async function assertJobSlot(userId) {
var active = await db.get("SELECT COUNT(*)::int AS n FROM user_resource_jobs WHERE user_id = ? AND status IN ('queued', 'running')", [userId]);
if (active && active.n >= MAX_ACTIVE_JOBS) {
throw httpError(409, MAX_ACTIVE_JOBS + ' resources are already being written. Wait for one to finish.');
}
}
/** Run one queued job to its end and record how it ended. Never throws. */
async function runResourceJob(jobId, userId, body) {
async function runResourceJob(jobId, userId, body, kind, resourceId) {
try {
await db.run("UPDATE user_resource_jobs SET status = 'running', started_at = NOW() WHERE id = ?", [jobId]);
var result = await generateResource(userId, body);
// A modification needs the author, not just their id: the deck is rendered for
// sight and each figure is read back under their ownership. Loaded here rather
// than carried in the request, so the job holds no stale session.
var result = kind === 'refine'
? await refineResource(await db.get('SELECT id, email, name, role, totp_enabled, disabled FROM users WHERE id = ?', [userId]), resourceId, body)
: await generateResource(userId, body);
var summary = {
resource: result.resource, grounding: result.grounding, imageJobs: result.imageJobs,
imageFailures: result.imageFailures, searches: result.searches, review: result.review,
deckFallback: result.deckFallback, model: result.model
deckFallback: result.deckFallback, model: result.model,
// Read back by the page for a modification; absent for a generation.
unchanged: result.unchanged, saw: result.saw
};
await db.run("UPDATE user_resource_jobs SET status = 'done', finished_at = NOW(), resource_id = ?, result = ? WHERE id = ?",
[result.resource.id, JSON.stringify(summary), jobId]);
@ -614,10 +631,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/generate', async function (req, res) {
try {
var topic = String(req.body.topic || '').trim();
if (!topic) return res.status(400).json({ error: 'A topic is required' });
var active = await db.get("SELECT COUNT(*)::int AS n FROM user_resource_jobs WHERE user_id = ? AND status IN ('queued', 'running')", [req.user.id]);
if (active && active.n >= MAX_ACTIVE_JOBS) {
return res.status(409).json({ error: MAX_ACTIVE_JOBS + ' resources are already being written. Wait for one to finish.' });
}
await assertJobSlot(req.user.id);
var count = await db.get('SELECT COUNT(*)::int AS n FROM user_resources WHERE user_id = ?', [req.user.id]);
if (count && count.n >= MAX_PER_USER) {
return res.status(409).json({ error: 'You have reached ' + MAX_PER_USER + ' saved resources. Delete one first.' });
@ -626,7 +640,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/generate', async function (req, res) {
'INSERT INTO user_resource_jobs (user_id, topic, kind, request) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?) ' +
'RETURNING id, topic, kind, status, created_at',
[req.user.id, topic.slice(0, 500), normalizeKind(req.body.kind), JSON.stringify(req.body || {})]);
runResourceJob(job.id, req.user.id, req.body || {});
runResourceJob(job.id, req.user.id, req.body || {}, 'generate', null);
res.status(202).json({ success: true, job: job });
} catch (err) {
console.error('[my-resources] generate:', err.message);
@ -1026,16 +1040,19 @@ router.put('/my-resources/:id/theme', async function (req, res) {
}
});
router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
try {
var instructions = String(req.body.instructions || '').trim();
if (!instructions) return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Say what to change' });
// Modify a resource. The same shape as generating: the caller queues the work
// and the page follows it as a job, so the tab can be closed while it runs.
// Ownership is re-checked here rather than only at enqueue, because the
// resource can be deleted while the job waits its turn.
async function refineResource(user, resourceId, body) {
var instructions = String(body.instructions || '').trim();
if (!instructions) throw httpError(400, 'Say what to change');
var existing = await db.get(
'SELECT id, kind, topic, markdown, deck, image_ids, theme FROM user_resources WHERE id = ? AND user_id = ?',
[parseInt(req.params.id, 10), req.user.id]
[resourceId, user.id]
);
if (!existing) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Not found' });
if (!existing) throw httpError(404, 'Not found');
// Modifying can reach for the same sources as generating: "add what the
// 2024 trial showed" is a request for material, not just a rewording, and
@ -1043,7 +1060,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
// subject searched is the resource's own topic plus the instruction, so a
// request about something not in the original still finds it.
var subject = [existing.topic, instructions].filter(Boolean).join(' \u2014 ').slice(0, 500);
var sources = await gatherSources(subject, req.body, existing.topic || instructions);
var sources = await gatherSources(subject, body, existing.topic || instructions);
var material = '';
if (sources.corpus.context) {
@ -1101,7 +1118,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
var visionModel = existingDeck
? String(await db.getSetting('my_resources.review_model', '') || '') : '';
var slideViews = visionModel
? await renderDeckForSight(existingDeck, existing.image_ids, req.user)
? await renderDeckForSight(existingDeck, existing.image_ids, user)
: [];
var sight = !slideViews.length ? '' :
'\n\nYou can see the deck as it renders now: ' + slideViews.length + ' image' +
@ -1134,7 +1151,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
// echoed "make it better" back unchanged and the vision model did not.
// An explicit choice by the author still wins over both.
var options = {
model: req.body.model ? await resolveModel(req.body.model)
model: body.model ? await resolveModel(body.model)
: (visionModel && slideViews.length ? visionModel : await resolveModel('')),
temperature: 0.2, maxTokens: 16000,
// A revision is writing. This is the call a thirteen-slide deck made the
@ -1151,7 +1168,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
var ai = await callAI(messages, callOptions);
if (sources.wantsImages && !existingDeck) {
ai = await resourceImages.dispatch(ai, {
owner: req.user.id, body: req.body, subject: subject, imageModel: sources.imageModel,
owner: user.id, body: body, subject: subject, imageModel: sources.imageModel,
messages: messages, options: options, callAI: callAI
});
}
@ -1162,7 +1179,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
// silently drop every layout the deck held.
logRefine({ id: existing.id, path: 'deck', outcome: 'refused',
detail: 'the model did not return a usable deck', instructions: instructions });
return res.status(502).json({ error: 'That change could not be applied. Try wording it differently.' });
throw httpError(502, 'That change could not be applied. Try wording it differently.');
}
if (revisedDeck) {
// Carried through rather than trusted from the reply.
@ -1178,7 +1195,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
// so each new figure belongs to the slide that wanted it.
if (sources.wantsImages) {
var drawn = await deckBuild.drawFigures(revisedDeck, {
owner: req.user.id, body: req.body, subject: subject, imageModel: sources.imageModel
owner: user.id, body: body, subject: subject, imageModel: sources.imageModel
});
ai = Object.assign({}, ai, { imageJobs: drawn.jobs, imageFailures: drawn.failures });
} else {
@ -1216,7 +1233,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
var revised = revisedDeck ? deckSchema.toMarkdown(revisedDeck)
: String((ai && ai.content) || '').trim();
if (!revised) return res.status(502).json({ error: 'The model returned nothing. Try again.' });
if (!revised) throw httpError(502, 'The model returned nothing. Try again.');
// Figures from a modification are added to the ones already there, not
// swapped for them: "add two more diagrams" means more, not instead.
@ -1226,7 +1243,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
'image_ids = image_ids || ?::jsonb, deck = COALESCE(?::jsonb, deck) ' +
'WHERE id = ? AND user_id = ? RETURNING id, title, updated_at',
[revised, firstHeading(revised), JSON.stringify(added),
revisedDeck ? JSON.stringify(revisedDeck) : null, existing.id, req.user.id]
revisedDeck ? JSON.stringify(revisedDeck) : null, existing.id, user.id]
);
// Said out loud, every time. A modification that changes nothing is the
// failure worth catching, and it is invisible from the response: the row
@ -1249,7 +1266,7 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
instructions: instructions
});
res.json({
return {
success: true, resource: row, markdown: revised, unchanged: unchanged,
saw: slideViews.length,
review: { applied: verified.reviewed, reason: verified.reason },
@ -1259,13 +1276,36 @@ router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
imageJobs: ai.imageJobs || [],
imageFailures: ai.imageFailures || [],
model: ai && ai.model
});
};
}
// Queue a modification and answer at once, exactly as generating does. The work
// is a job on the server, so a browser that gives up waiting — Firefox abandons
// a non-streaming fetch at five minutes — no longer takes the modification down
// with it, and a reload loses nothing.
router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine', async function (req, res) {
try {
var instructions = String(req.body.instructions || '').trim();
if (!instructions) return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Say what to change' });
var resourceId = parseInt(req.params.id, 10);
var existing = await db.get('SELECT id, topic FROM user_resources WHERE id = ? AND user_id = ?',
[resourceId, req.user.id]);
if (!existing) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Not found' });
await assertJobSlot(req.user.id);
var job = await db.get(
'INSERT INTO user_resource_jobs (user_id, topic, kind, resource_id, request) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?) ' +
'RETURNING id, topic, kind, status, created_at',
[req.user.id, String(existing.topic || instructions).slice(0, 500), 'refine', resourceId,
JSON.stringify(req.body || {})]);
runResourceJob(job.id, req.user.id, req.body || {}, 'refine', resourceId);
res.status(202).json({ success: true, job: job });
} catch (err) {
console.error('[my-resources] refine:', err.message);
res.status(err.statusCode || 500).json({ error: err.statusCode ? err.message : 'Refinement failed' });
res.status(err.statusCode || 500).json({ error: err.statusCode ? err.message : 'Modification could not be started' });
}
});
// ── Showing the deck to the model that is about to change it ────────────────
// The model that writes a deck never sees it, and that is just as true when it
// is editing one. Most of what people ask for while modifying is about the
@ -1438,4 +1478,5 @@ module.exports = router;
// The job runner's body, reachable for tests that exercise a generation
// end to end without waiting on a detached job.
module.exports.generateResource = generateResource;
module.exports.refineResource = refineResource;
module.exports.runResourceJob = runResourceJob;

View file

@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ test('the reviewer is admin-chosen, off by default, and runs once per change', (
// rendered again — exactly the class of fault the reviewer exists for. The
// old rule assumed refining was a text edit; it is a layout edit as often as
// not.
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine'"));
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("async function refineResource("));
assert.match(refine, /deckReview\.review\(revisedDeck/);
assert.match(refine, /if \(revisedDeck && visionModel\)/, 'and only when one is configured');
// Still one pass. The verification runs on the result, never in a loop.
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ test('the review is asked without thinking when the caller says so', () => {
const route = read('src/routes/myResources.js');
const gen = route.slice(route.indexOf('async function generateResource('), route.indexOf('async function runResourceJob('));
assert.match(gen, /reasoningEffort: options\.reasoningEffort,/, 'generation\u2019s review inherits the writing\u2019s rule');
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine'"));
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("async function refineResource("));
assert.match(refine, /reasoningEffort: 'none'/, 'a revision is writing');
assert.equal((refine.match(/reasoningEffort: options\.reasoningEffort,/g) || []).length, 1,
'and its review is asked the same way');

View file

@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ test('a modification keeps the deck\'s theme', () => {
// The model returns a new deck; the look was never its to choose. The
// column keeps the theme regardless, but the deck field must agree with it.
const route = read('src/routes/myResources.js');
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine'"));
const refine = route.slice(route.indexOf("async function refineResource("));
assert.match(refine, /revisedDeck\.theme = existingDeck\.theme \|\| existing\.theme \|\| revisedDeck\.theme/);
assert.match(refine.slice(0, 2500), /SELECT id, kind, topic, markdown, deck, image_ids, theme FROM user_resources/);
});

View file

@ -120,7 +120,18 @@ function router(t, overrides = {}) {
async function generate(body) {
return module.exports.generateResource(7, body);
}
return { request, generate, aiCalls, updates, reviewCalls, reviewOptions };
// Modifying is queued as a job too, so the tests that care what the writing
// does call its body directly, exactly as the generation tests do. The reply
// is shaped like the old synchronous one so the assertions stay about
// behaviour rather than about how the work is scheduled.
async function refine(body, id) {
try {
return { statusCode: 200, body: await module.exports.refineResource({ id: 7 }, id || 5, body) };
} catch (err) {
return { statusCode: err.statusCode || 500, body: { error: err.message } };
}
}
return { request, generate, refine, aiCalls, updates, reviewCalls, reviewOptions };
}
test('modifying a deck asks for a deck, even when illustration is on', async () => {
@ -133,7 +144,7 @@ test('modifying a deck asks for a deck, even when illustration is on', async ()
const r = router(null, {
reply: JSON.stringify({ slides: [DECK.slides[0], { type: 'bullets', title: 'Features', bullets: ['Barking cough', 'Stridor', 'Hoarse voice'] }] })
});
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', {
const res = await r.refine( {
instructions: 'add a third feature', withImages: 'true'
});
@ -154,7 +165,7 @@ test('a modification the model returned unchanged says so instead of claiming su
// logged server-side, where the person who could reword the instruction
// could not see it.
const r = router(null, { reply: JSON.stringify({ slides: DECK.slides }) });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'make it better' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'make it better' });
assert.equal(res.statusCode, 200);
assert.equal(res.body.unchanged, true, 'the caller is told the deck came back identical');
@ -164,7 +175,7 @@ test('a modification that did change the deck reports itself as changed', async
const r = router(null, {
reply: JSON.stringify({ slides: [DECK.slides[0], { type: 'bullets', title: 'Features', bullets: ['Barking cough', 'Stridor', 'Hoarse voice'] }] })
});
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'add a third feature' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'add a third feature' });
assert.equal(res.body.unchanged, false);
assert.equal(r.updates.length, 1, 'and the row is written');
@ -173,7 +184,7 @@ test('a modification that did change the deck reports itself as changed', async
test('a presentation with no deck still modifies, through the markdown path', async () => {
const r = router(null, { row: { deck: null }, reply: '# Croup\n\n- Barking cough\n- Stridor\n- Hoarse voice\n' });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', {
const res = await r.refine( {
instructions: 'add a third feature', withImages: 'true'
});
@ -195,7 +206,9 @@ test('the library says which presentations carry a deck, and the row shows when
assert.match(ui, /row\.updated_at \? new Date\(row\.updated_at\)/);
assert.match(ui, /edited \? 'modified '/);
assert.match(ui, /has_deck === false \? ' · plain text, no slide layout' : ''/);
assert.match(ui, /if \(data\.unchanged\) \{/);
// A modification reports from the job list now that it runs in the background,
// so "it came back unchanged" still reaches the person who asked for it.
assert.match(ui, /if \(r\.unchanged\) \{/);
});
// ── Generating a deck ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@ -271,7 +284,7 @@ test('modifying a resource is writing too, and is asked without thinking', async
// a thirteen-slide deck it reasoned for a minute and a half before writing a
// word, which is past the point a browser waits for the request.
const r = router(null, { reply: JSON.stringify({ slides: DECK.slides }) });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'make it better' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'make it better' });
assert.equal(res.statusCode, 200);
assert.equal(r.aiCalls[0].options.reasoningEffort, 'none');
@ -329,7 +342,7 @@ test('modifying a deck shows the model what the deck currently looks like', asyn
// "that slide is crowded", "the diagram is in the wrong place" — and none of
// it is answerable from the JSON alone.
const r = router(null, { visionModel: 'seeing-model', slideImages: TWO_PNGS, replies: [EDITED] });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', {
const res = await r.refine( {
instructions: 'slide 2 looks crowded, split it'
});
@ -346,7 +359,7 @@ test('the edited deck is rendered again and checked', async () => {
// The edit was made against how the deck looked *before* it. A slide that
// gained two bullets only overflows once it is rendered again.
const r = router(null, { visionModel: 'seeing-model', slideImages: TWO_PNGS, replies: [EDITED] });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'add a feature' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'add a feature' });
assert.equal(r.reviewCalls.length, 1, 'the result goes back past the reviewer');
assert.equal(res.body.review.applied, true);
@ -356,7 +369,7 @@ test('with no vision model configured, modify still works and never renders', as
// Sight is an upgrade, not a dependency. Nothing here may become a new way
// for a modification to fail.
const r = router(null, { replies: [EDITED] });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'add a feature' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'add a feature' });
assert.equal(res.statusCode, 200);
assert.equal(res.body.saw, 0);
@ -368,7 +381,7 @@ test('a render that fails falls through to editing blind rather than failing', a
// Gotenberg down, LibreOffice wedged, a deck too big: none of them may cost
// the author their modification.
const r = router(null, { visionModel: 'seeing-model', slideImages: [], replies: [EDITED] });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'add a feature' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'add a feature' });
assert.equal(res.statusCode, 200);
assert.equal(res.body.saw, 0);
@ -382,7 +395,7 @@ test('an echo is still reported as an echo, even when the reviewer moved somethi
// achieved nothing look like it had worked.
const r = router(null, { visionModel: 'seeing-model', slideImages: TWO_PNGS,
replies: [JSON.stringify({ slides: DECK.slides })] });
const res = await r.request('post', '/my-resources/:id/refine', { instructions: 'make it better' });
const res = await r.refine( { instructions: 'make it better' });
assert.equal(res.body.unchanged, true, 'judged on the model edit, before the reviewer ran');
});

View file

@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ test('illustration is opt-in, with its own dispatcher rather than the assistant
assert.match(read('public/js/generatedImages.js'), /my_resources: '\/api\/my-resources\/image\/jobs\/'/);
// And it renders where the person is looking, rather than pointing them at an
// image history this feature does not have.
assert.match(read('public/js/myResources.js'), /showIllustrations\(data\.imageJobs \|\| \[\]\)/);
assert.match(read('public/js/myResources.js'), /showIllustrations\(r\.imageJobs \|\| \[\]\)/);
assert.match(read('public/components/my-resources.html'), /id="mr-images"/);
assert.match(route, /imageJobs: ai\.imageJobs \|\| \[\]/, 'and reported back');

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ test('every read route goes through the reader rule; every write route still fil
const body = route.slice(route.indexOf(marker), route.indexOf('\n});', route.indexOf(marker)));
assert.match(body, /await readableResource\(req\.params\.id, req\.user\.id/, marker + ' reads through the rule');
}
for (const marker of ["router.put('/my-resources/:id/theme'", "router.post('/my-resources/:id/refine'", "router.delete('/my-resources/:id'", "router.put('/my-resources/:id'"]) {
for (const marker of ["router.put('/my-resources/:id/theme'", "async function refineResource(", "router.delete('/my-resources/:id'", "router.put('/my-resources/:id'"]) {
const body = route.slice(route.indexOf(marker), route.indexOf('\n});', route.indexOf(marker)));
assert.match(body, /AND user_id = \?/, marker + ' stays the owner\'s');
assert.doesNotMatch(body, /readableResource/, marker + ' is not opened to readers');

View file

@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ test('searching is the route\u2019s job, not something the model is asked to do'
// different sources or searching them differently.
assert.match(route, /async function gatherSources\(subject, body, keywords\)/);
assert.match(route, /var sources = await gatherSources\(topic, body\);/, 'generate');
assert.match(route, /var sources = await gatherSources\(subject, req\.body, existing\.topic \|\| instructions\);/,
assert.match(route, /var sources = await gatherSources\(subject, body, existing\.topic \|\| instructions\);/,
'and modify, whose library search gets the instruction for context and whose keyword searches do not');
// Declared before they are used. They were not, once: `var` hoisting made