The syntax was known only to the code that parses it. This is the author's
side of it: `[[264|respiratory failure]]` and why the id form is the one that
cannot rot, `==key points==` and the three rules the parser follows,
`{{phrase|tip}}`, what each of the three views is for, how to link a question
or a whole topic, and what deleting does to a draft versus to something that
has been published.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
written down
The yellow was a gradient stripe under the x-height, which reads as an
underline rather than a highlight and all but vanishes on a wrapped line.
It is a solid band now, the way a highlighter leaves one.
A block that ends without warning ends on whatever question you happened
to be reading. Five minutes out it says so — once, because a warning that
returns every second is a warning nobody reads.
And docs/adaptive-sessions.md, because "prioritised by impact" was a
phrase with no written meaning. It says where the code is, what the three
rules are — unanswered first, weakest topic among those, then wrong ones
oldest first with the category damped so twenty questions do not all come
from your worst subject — and, as plainly, what it does not do: it is not
weighted by the exam blueprint. Weakest and most-of-the-paper are
different questions and we answer only the first. The refinement that
would combine them is written down too, with the column that already
holds the weights.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
