The first version of the check flagged it alongside 'No protocols are
available'. The difference is whether the sentence is about the medicine
or about the source. Two false positives down to none; the two real ones
are both Pediatric Dentistry, whose source was a disclaimer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
A section that promises an answer and then says 'No presentation details
are available' is worse than a missing one. Reported rather than
refused: a one-line prognosis is often the whole honest answer, so the
length alone cannot decide it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
Comparing marker and number *sets* reported 'lost -, added -' whenever a
token merely appeared a different number of times — printed on the line
explaining why the article was refused, which read as a contradiction.
It counts repeats now: 'cross-references changed (duplicated 396x1)',
which is what actually happened to Cystic Fibrosis.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The clinical view of an article was often one numbered list running from
the presenting complaint to discharge. Splitting it into Clinical paths
/ Diagnosis / Management necessarily divides that list — and because the
validator required every numeric token to survive, the restructure kept
the original numbering. Sections opened on "2." and "4.".
The "3." of a list item is a position, not a fact. It is stripped before
numbers are compared, so a restructure is free to renumber; and import
renumbers every section's lists from 1 regardless, per indentation
level, so a nested list counts independently of its parent. A blank line
between items is a loose list, not a new one, and does not reset it.
25 sections across 16 of the 54 already applied were repaired in place.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
The Short and Long views have a structure; the Clinical view has none.
413 sections across 323 articles carry 242 different titles, most of
them one free-form block called 'Management' holding everything from the
presenting complaint to discharge advice.
The shape is medical decision making: Clinical paths, Diagnosis,
Management, and Prognosis and outcome where it adds something.
This pass moves text between sections, so nothing can be checked section
by section the way the prose pass was. Every check is over the whole
article's clinical view at once — the same cross-references, the same
numbers, the same overall length — plus the shape itself: known titles,
in order, none missing, none twice. Content may be reordered and resplit
freely; it may not appear or vanish.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqXevQJhxFrM7jJg82cgZN
