`Agent.from_spec` raised `TypeError` on `RAGCapability` and `AnalysisCapability`,
whose constructors take a state class, packaged instruction text and a tool-name
set, and silently omitted both from the generated spec schema. The two
zero-configuration capabilities constructed but with `id=None`, so pydantic-ai's
duplicate-id rejection no longer held and a spec could register two citation
policies, defeating the single-decision-maker invariant.
Override `from_spec` on all four, delegating to `create_capability()` so ids and
instructions come from one place. The spec surface is `db_path`, `config`,
`defer_loading`, `request_limit` and `vision`; a live `HaikuRAG` client stays out
of it, and a `config` mapping is validated through `AppConfig`.
The documented `HaikuRAG("knowledge.lancedb")` and `rag(db_path="my.lancedb")`
forms both raised `AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'exists'`.
`Store.__init__` assigned its argument to a `Path`-annotated attribute without
coercing, and `resolve_db_path` returned a non-None argument unchanged. Every
runnable example wraps the path in `Path(...)`, which is why it survived.
Coerce in `Store.__init__` and `resolve_db_path`; widen the annotations on
`Store`, `HaikuRAG` and both `create_capability` factories to accept `str`.
RAGState and AnalysisState each declared the same five fields, so the generic
base could not name them: StateT was bound to BaseModel, and every access
went through cast(Any, state), a getattr by string, or a loop clearing fields
by name so it could skip the one only AnalysisState has.
EvidenceState declares them once. RAGState adds nothing, AnalysisState adds
executions and overrides begin_invocation to clear them. StateT binds to
EvidenceState, which removes all ten casts and both state-shape getattrs; the
three getattr(ctx.deps, "state") probes stay, since those check a
host-supplied object rather than our own state.
discover_evidence reached into capability.state for two fields. It now asks
through evidence_record() and citation_index(), alongside the
evidence_tool_names() and cite_available accessors it already used. The eval
runner's _RagLikeState protocol and the chat app's getattr reads described
this shape from outside and are gone.
Compatibility is semantic JSON-object equivalence, not bytes: field names and
nesting are unchanged, so a dict stored by 0.75.0 loads and re-dumps equal,
but deriving from a shared base reorders AnalysisState's keys. Nothing
serializes, hashes or string-compares this state — every carry point
re-validates by key.
`client.ask` and `client.analyze` built their capability from a db_path, so the
capability opened a second connection to the database the client already had
open, once per call.
Ownership is now explicit rather than inferred. `rag` stays the connection the
capability opened and must close; `borrowed_rag` is a caller's, which
`_ensure_rag` prefers and `_close` never touches. Two fields rather than a flag,
so closing a borrowed connection is not expressible.
`for_run` still clears `rag` per run, since a run owns what it opens. It leaves
`borrowed_rag` alone: that connection belongs to the caller and outlives the run.
`CapabilityEvidenceRecord` holds the relationships a transcript cannot express:
which chunks a capability retrieved, which it cited, in which questions, and at
which point in the conversation. RAG and analysis each own one in their own state
namespace. Nothing is co-written: the host's state is JSON storage, so a shared
record would be overwritten by whichever capability synced last, and merging
happens in transient per-request views instead.
Both clocks are derived from the conversation rather than counted locally, so
every participant computes the same values without sharing a counter. Question
identity is the message count when the question arrived; epoch is the message
count at an outcome. Epochs are therefore globally comparable, which is what
lets `citation_status` require a declaration to follow the newest evidence of
every capability, and what makes equal epochs mean one request.
A declaration is written only after `resolve_citations` succeeds, so a call
naming only unresolvable ids is not a citation. Status is derived, never stored,
so refs and status cannot contradict.
Resuming a question requires the host to carry the capability state from the run
being resumed. Without it the identity of the question in progress is unknowable,
and adopting the current message count would relabel that question as a new one
and judge every declaration in it against the wrong identity.
Nothing reads the records yet and no wire behaviour changes.
