update benchmarks
This commit is contained in:
parent
97a7eb246c
commit
abc5a210a6
1 changed files with 10 additions and 9 deletions
|
|
@ -147,12 +147,15 @@ Two approaches are benchmarked separately:
|
|||
|
||||
##### QA Accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
| Embedding Model | QA Model | Source bucket | Cases | Accuracy |
|
||||
|------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------|------:|---------:|
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `ollama:qwen3.6` (vision) | text only | 682 | 96.9 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `ollama:qwen3.6` (vision) | with image | 299 | 91.3 % |
|
||||
|
||||
The text-vs-image gap on retrieval is small (0.81 pp) but on QA it widens to ~5.6 pp — most of the loss is downstream of retrieval, in the model reasoning over image-bearing chunks rather than in finding them.
|
||||
| Embedding Model | QA Model | Reranker | Source bucket | Cases | Accuracy |
|
||||
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------|---------------|------:|---------:|
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `ollama:qwen3.6` (vision) | none | text only | 682 | 96.9 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `ollama:qwen3.6` (vision) | none | with image | 299 | 91.3 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | text | 894 | 88.5 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | text+image | 341 | 88.0 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | text+table | 72 | 88.9 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | text+table+image | 102 | 93.1 % |
|
||||
| `Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B` | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | **all** | 1409 | **88.7 %** |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Text embedder + VLM picture descriptions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -172,9 +175,7 @@ The text-vs-image gap on retrieval is small (0.81 pp) but on QA it widens to ~5.
|
|||
| `qwen3-embedding:4b` | Ollama / ministral-3 | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | none | 0.81 |
|
||||
| `qwen3-embedding:4b` | Ollama / ministral-3 | `vllm:Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4` | `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` | 0.92 |
|
||||
|
||||
*Measured on haiku.rag v0.45.0, judged by `ollama:qwen3.6` (current default). T
|
||||
|
||||
On Gemma-4 the reranker is worth +11 percentage points. Inspecting the no-reranker failures, the dominant patterns are RRF score compression (the right chunk in top-8 but not top-1), FTS keyword bleed from unrelated papers, and References-section chunks competing with body sections. `mxbai-rerank-base-v2` resolves all three on most cases.
|
||||
*Measured on haiku.rag v0.45.0, judged by `ollama:qwen3.6` (current default).*
|
||||
|
||||
##### Skill QA + citation retrieval
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue