danvics/awesome-arr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

new AI policy (#115)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Ravencentric 2026-04-30 15:02:56 +05:30 committed by GitHub
parent 8e0e2e3630
commit 9899b013e2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
.github/pull_request_template.md vendored
View file

@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
<!-- <!-- Please note that this project is released with a
# Contribution Guidelines [Contributor Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
By participating in this project you agree to abide by its terms. -->
Please note that this project is released with a ## Submission
[Contributor Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md). By participating in this
project you agree to abide by its terms. - Name - A short description that clearly explains what the project does, without marketing fluff.
--- ---
Ensure your pull request adheres to the following guidelines: ## Requirements
- Follow the format `- [Name](link) - A small description.` - [ ] Entry uses format: `- [Name](link) - Description`
- Maintain alphabetical order in each category. - [ ] Entry is in alphabetical order within its section
- Submitted projects must meet a popularity threshold: - [ ] Project has >=100 GitHub stars (if hosted on GitHub)[^1]
- **GitHub:** Minimum 50 stars. - [ ] Project is at least 1 year old (from first public release)
- **Other Platforms:** Comparable community interest. - [ ] Project shows recent activity (within ~12 months)
- [ ] Project is not mostly auto-generated[^2]
- [ ] This PR was written by a human. If you do not have time to write it yourself, I do not have time to review it
I apologize if this feels like an arbitrary hurdle. Unfortunately, to keep this list focused and manageable, Submissions that do not meet these criteria may be closed without review.
and to ensure it highlights projects that have demonstrated some level of community validation,
I need a way to fairly filter submissions. I simply cannot include every project, and without some kind of metric,
reviewing and rejecting projects becomes very subjective and unsustainable.
This check is an attempt to introduce a degree of fairness and objectivity to the process. Thank you for your understanding. [^1]: Not a strict requirement, interesting projects may still be considered even if they have fewer stars.
--> [^2]: Any use of AI in the project must be disclosed honestly in the project itself (e.g., in the README or documentation).